YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Gulf Stream and Ring Feature Analyses for Forecast Model Validation*

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1997:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 006::page 1366
    Author:
    Glenn, Scott M.
    ,
    Crowley, Michael F.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<1366:GSARFA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A series of Gulf Stream forecast model test cases were developed for the Data Assimilation and Model Evaluation Experiment (DAMEE). The model initialization and verification procedure relies heavily on a series of accurate synoptic snapshots of the Gulf Stream north wall and ring locations. Satellite infrared imagery, Geosat altimetry, and numerous in situ temperature profiles were combined using a geographic information system to construct Gulf Stream and ring location analyses at approximately weekly intervals during a 6-week, data-rich time period. To improve the accuracy of the feature analyses, a new image compositing technique called patching was developed to decrease the spatial smearing experienced with standard warmest pixel composites. During the 6-week test period, three ring formations, two ring absorptions, and one ring merger event were observed. The average difference between the weekly north wall positions ranged from 20 to 34 km (average 27 km). When the DAMEE GSR north wall positions were compared to two independent analyses for the same time period, the average offsets were found to vary from 14 to 53 km (average 29 km) for the first comparison set and 14 to 30 km (average 22 km) for the second. These differences, which are similar in magnitude to the observed weekly evolution, are attributed to differences in the data treatment for cloudy regions and the subjectivity of the image analysts when dealing with incomplete data.
    • Download: (4.459Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Gulf Stream and Ring Feature Analyses for Forecast Model Validation*

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148801
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGlenn, Scott M.
    contributor authorCrowley, Michael F.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:09:08Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:09:08Z
    date copyright1997/12/01
    date issued1997
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1336.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148801
    description abstractA series of Gulf Stream forecast model test cases were developed for the Data Assimilation and Model Evaluation Experiment (DAMEE). The model initialization and verification procedure relies heavily on a series of accurate synoptic snapshots of the Gulf Stream north wall and ring locations. Satellite infrared imagery, Geosat altimetry, and numerous in situ temperature profiles were combined using a geographic information system to construct Gulf Stream and ring location analyses at approximately weekly intervals during a 6-week, data-rich time period. To improve the accuracy of the feature analyses, a new image compositing technique called patching was developed to decrease the spatial smearing experienced with standard warmest pixel composites. During the 6-week test period, three ring formations, two ring absorptions, and one ring merger event were observed. The average difference between the weekly north wall positions ranged from 20 to 34 km (average 27 km). When the DAMEE GSR north wall positions were compared to two independent analyses for the same time period, the average offsets were found to vary from 14 to 53 km (average 29 km) for the first comparison set and 14 to 30 km (average 22 km) for the second. These differences, which are similar in magnitude to the observed weekly evolution, are attributed to differences in the data treatment for cloudy regions and the subjectivity of the image analysts when dealing with incomplete data.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleGulf Stream and Ring Feature Analyses for Forecast Model Validation*
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<1366:GSARFA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1366
    journal lastpage1378
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1997:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian