YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part II: Validation

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2003:;volume( 042 ):;issue: 012::page 1748
    Author:
    Loeb, Norman G.
    ,
    Loukachine, Konstantin
    ,
    Manalo-Smith, Natividad
    ,
    Wielicki, Bruce A.
    ,
    Young, David F.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1748:ADMFTR>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) are estimated from empirical angular distribution models (ADMs) that convert instantaneous radiance measurements to TOA fluxes. This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes obtained from a new set of ADMs developed for the CERES instrument onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM). The uncertainty in regional monthly mean reflected shortwave (SW) and emitted longwave (LW) TOA fluxes is less than 0.5 W m?2, based on comparisons with TOA fluxes evaluated by direct integration of the measured radiances. When stratified by viewing geometry, TOA fluxes from different angles are consistent to within 2% in the SW and 0.7% (or 2 W m?2) in the LW. In contrast, TOA fluxes based on ADMs from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) applied to the same CERES radiance measurements show a 10% relative increase with viewing zenith angle in the SW and a 3.5% (9 W m?2) decrease with viewing zenith angle in the LW. Based on multiangle CERES radiance measurements, 1° regional instantaneous TOA flux errors from the new CERES ADMs are estimated to be <10 W m?2 in the SW and <3.5 W m?2 in the LW. The errors show little or no dependence on cloud phase, cloud optical depth, and cloud infrared emissivity. An analysis of cloud radiative forcing (CRF) sensitivity to differences between ERBE and CERES TRMM ADMs, scene identification, and directional models of albedo as a function of solar zenith angle shows that ADM and clear-sky scene identification differences can lead to an 8 W m?2 root-mean-square (rms) difference in 1° daily mean SW CRF and a 4 W m?2 rms difference in LW CRF. In contrast, monthly mean SW and LW CRF differences reach 3 W m?2. CRF is found to be relatively insensitive to differences between the ERBE and CERES TRMM directional models.
    • Download: (978.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Angular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part II: Validation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148756
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLoeb, Norman G.
    contributor authorLoukachine, Konstantin
    contributor authorManalo-Smith, Natividad
    contributor authorWielicki, Bruce A.
    contributor authorYoung, David F.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:09:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:09:00Z
    date copyright2003/12/01
    date issued2003
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-13319.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148756
    description abstractTop-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) are estimated from empirical angular distribution models (ADMs) that convert instantaneous radiance measurements to TOA fluxes. This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes obtained from a new set of ADMs developed for the CERES instrument onboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM). The uncertainty in regional monthly mean reflected shortwave (SW) and emitted longwave (LW) TOA fluxes is less than 0.5 W m?2, based on comparisons with TOA fluxes evaluated by direct integration of the measured radiances. When stratified by viewing geometry, TOA fluxes from different angles are consistent to within 2% in the SW and 0.7% (or 2 W m?2) in the LW. In contrast, TOA fluxes based on ADMs from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) applied to the same CERES radiance measurements show a 10% relative increase with viewing zenith angle in the SW and a 3.5% (9 W m?2) decrease with viewing zenith angle in the LW. Based on multiangle CERES radiance measurements, 1° regional instantaneous TOA flux errors from the new CERES ADMs are estimated to be <10 W m?2 in the SW and <3.5 W m?2 in the LW. The errors show little or no dependence on cloud phase, cloud optical depth, and cloud infrared emissivity. An analysis of cloud radiative forcing (CRF) sensitivity to differences between ERBE and CERES TRMM ADMs, scene identification, and directional models of albedo as a function of solar zenith angle shows that ADM and clear-sky scene identification differences can lead to an 8 W m?2 root-mean-square (rms) difference in 1° daily mean SW CRF and a 4 W m?2 rms difference in LW CRF. In contrast, monthly mean SW and LW CRF differences reach 3 W m?2. CRF is found to be relatively insensitive to differences between the ERBE and CERES TRMM directional models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAngular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Satellite. Part II: Validation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume42
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1748:ADMFTR>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1748
    journal lastpage1769
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2003:;volume( 042 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian