YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of TRMM Precipitation Radar and Airborne Radar Data

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2003:;volume( 042 ):;issue: 006::page 769
    Author:
    Durden, S. L.
    ,
    Im, E.
    ,
    Haddad, Z. S.
    ,
    Li, L.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0769:COTPRA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The first spaceborne weather radar is the precipitation radar (PR) on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), which was launched in 1997. As part of the TRMM calibration and validation effort, an airborne rain-mapping radar (ARMAR) was used to make underflights of TRMM during the B portion of the Texas and Florida Underflights (TEFLUN-B) and the third Convection and Moisture Experiment (CAMEX-3) in 1998 and the Kwajalein Experiment (KWAJEX) in 1999. The TRMM PR and ARMAR both operate at 14 GHz, and both instruments use a downward-looking, cross-track scanning geometry, which allows direct comparison of data. Nearly simultaneous PR and ARMAR data were acquired in seven separate cases. These data are compared to examine the effects of larger resolution volume and lower sensitivity in the PR data relative to ARMAR. The PR and ARMAR data show similar structures, although the PR data tend to have lower maximum reflectivities and path attenuations because of nonuniform beam-filling effects. Nonuniform beam filling can also cause a bias in the observed path attenuation relative to that corresponding to the beam-averaged rain rate. The PR rain-type classification is usually consistent with the ARMAR data.
    • Download: (457.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of TRMM Precipitation Radar and Airborne Radar Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148675
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDurden, S. L.
    contributor authorIm, E.
    contributor authorHaddad, Z. S.
    contributor authorLi, L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:08:46Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:08:46Z
    date copyright2003/06/01
    date issued2003
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-13246.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148675
    description abstractThe first spaceborne weather radar is the precipitation radar (PR) on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), which was launched in 1997. As part of the TRMM calibration and validation effort, an airborne rain-mapping radar (ARMAR) was used to make underflights of TRMM during the B portion of the Texas and Florida Underflights (TEFLUN-B) and the third Convection and Moisture Experiment (CAMEX-3) in 1998 and the Kwajalein Experiment (KWAJEX) in 1999. The TRMM PR and ARMAR both operate at 14 GHz, and both instruments use a downward-looking, cross-track scanning geometry, which allows direct comparison of data. Nearly simultaneous PR and ARMAR data were acquired in seven separate cases. These data are compared to examine the effects of larger resolution volume and lower sensitivity in the PR data relative to ARMAR. The PR and ARMAR data show similar structures, although the PR data tend to have lower maximum reflectivities and path attenuations because of nonuniform beam-filling effects. Nonuniform beam filling can also cause a bias in the observed path attenuation relative to that corresponding to the beam-averaged rain rate. The PR rain-type classification is usually consistent with the ARMAR data.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of TRMM Precipitation Radar and Airborne Radar Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume42
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0769:COTPRA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage769
    journal lastpage774
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2003:;volume( 042 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian