YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    LKB-Based Evaporation Duct Model Comparison with Buoy Data

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2002:;volume( 041 ):;issue: 004::page 434
    Author:
    Babin, Steven M.
    ,
    Dockery, G. Daniel
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0434:LBEDMC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A wave-riding catamaran with a mast-traveling sensor package (profiling buoy) was developed to make fine-scale atmospheric measurements within the first meter above the ocean surface. These measurements are used to generate time-averaged modified refractivity (M) profiles that are then compared with those determined from four evaporation duct models based on the surface layer theory of Liu, Katsaros, and Businger (LKB). Model inputs are derived from measurements from masts on the R/V Chessie and from a tethered sea surface temperature buoy. Because electromagnetic propagation is critically dependent on the M-profile slopes, different analytical techniques are employed to compare the curvature of the model profiles with that of the profiles measured by the profiling buoy. One comparison criterion was to use the rms M slope difference between the model and a curve fit to the buoy profile data. Another analytical technique was to use the rms M difference after mean M removal between the model and the buoy profiles. Using these criteria for comparison of these models with the data seems to indicate that the model-derived profiles may be missing some phenomena in the surface layer such as wave effects. Overall, however, the shapes of the measured M profiles showed log-linear characteristics near the surface. One interesting result is that each model was better at approximating the M-profile curvature for stable than for unstable conditions.
    • Download: (207.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      LKB-Based Evaporation Duct Model Comparison with Buoy Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148556
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBabin, Steven M.
    contributor authorDockery, G. Daniel
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:08:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:08:23Z
    date copyright2002/04/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-13139.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148556
    description abstractA wave-riding catamaran with a mast-traveling sensor package (profiling buoy) was developed to make fine-scale atmospheric measurements within the first meter above the ocean surface. These measurements are used to generate time-averaged modified refractivity (M) profiles that are then compared with those determined from four evaporation duct models based on the surface layer theory of Liu, Katsaros, and Businger (LKB). Model inputs are derived from measurements from masts on the R/V Chessie and from a tethered sea surface temperature buoy. Because electromagnetic propagation is critically dependent on the M-profile slopes, different analytical techniques are employed to compare the curvature of the model profiles with that of the profiles measured by the profiling buoy. One comparison criterion was to use the rms M slope difference between the model and a curve fit to the buoy profile data. Another analytical technique was to use the rms M difference after mean M removal between the model and the buoy profiles. Using these criteria for comparison of these models with the data seems to indicate that the model-derived profiles may be missing some phenomena in the surface layer such as wave effects. Overall, however, the shapes of the measured M profiles showed log-linear characteristics near the surface. One interesting result is that each model was better at approximating the M-profile curvature for stable than for unstable conditions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleLKB-Based Evaporation Duct Model Comparison with Buoy Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume41
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0434:LBEDMC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage434
    journal lastpage446
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2002:;volume( 041 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian