YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Close is Close Enough When Measuring Scalar Fluxes with Displaced Sensors?

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1997:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 004::page 814
    Author:
    Kristensen, L.
    ,
    Mann, J.
    ,
    Oncley, S. P.
    ,
    Wyngaard, J. C.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0814:HCICEW>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: To improve the quality of scalar-flux measurements, the two-point covariance between the vertical velocity w? and a scalar s?, separated in space both horizontally and vertically, is studied. The measurements of such two-point covariances between vertical velocity and temperature with horizontal and vertical separations show good agreement with a symmetric turbulence model when the displacement is horizontal. However, a similar model does not work for vertical displacements because up?down asymmetry exists; that is, there is a lack of reflection symmetry of the covariance function. The second-order equation for conservation of two-point covariance of w? and s? reveals the reason for this up?down asymmetry and determines its character. On the basis of our measurements, the ?loss of flux? for a given lateral displacement decreases with increasing height of the sensors. For example, at a height of z = 10 m with a sensor displacement of D = 0.2 m, less than 1% of the flux is lost, whereas at z = 1 m the same instrument configuration gives rise to a loss of 13%. Also, when the displacement is vertical, the ?flux loss? decreases with height if the displacement is kept constant, but in this case the asymmetry causes the loss to be much smaller if the scalar sensor is positioned below the anemometer: if the mean height is 1 m and the displacement 0.2 m, the loss is 18% with the scalar sensor over the anemometer and only 2% if the instrument positions are interchanged. The authors conclude that when measuring close to the ground, the separation should be vertical with the scalar sensor below the anemometer. In this way a symmetric (omnidirectional) configuration with a minimum of flux loss is obtained.
    • Download: (133.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Close is Close Enough When Measuring Scalar Fluxes with Displaced Sensors?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148323
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKristensen, L.
    contributor authorMann, J.
    contributor authorOncley, S. P.
    contributor authorWyngaard, J. C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:07:39Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:07:39Z
    date copyright1997/08/01
    date issued1997
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1293.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148323
    description abstractTo improve the quality of scalar-flux measurements, the two-point covariance between the vertical velocity w? and a scalar s?, separated in space both horizontally and vertically, is studied. The measurements of such two-point covariances between vertical velocity and temperature with horizontal and vertical separations show good agreement with a symmetric turbulence model when the displacement is horizontal. However, a similar model does not work for vertical displacements because up?down asymmetry exists; that is, there is a lack of reflection symmetry of the covariance function. The second-order equation for conservation of two-point covariance of w? and s? reveals the reason for this up?down asymmetry and determines its character. On the basis of our measurements, the ?loss of flux? for a given lateral displacement decreases with increasing height of the sensors. For example, at a height of z = 10 m with a sensor displacement of D = 0.2 m, less than 1% of the flux is lost, whereas at z = 1 m the same instrument configuration gives rise to a loss of 13%. Also, when the displacement is vertical, the ?flux loss? decreases with height if the displacement is kept constant, but in this case the asymmetry causes the loss to be much smaller if the scalar sensor is positioned below the anemometer: if the mean height is 1 m and the displacement 0.2 m, the loss is 18% with the scalar sensor over the anemometer and only 2% if the instrument positions are interchanged. The authors conclude that when measuring close to the ground, the separation should be vertical with the scalar sensor below the anemometer. In this way a symmetric (omnidirectional) configuration with a minimum of flux loss is obtained.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleHow Close is Close Enough When Measuring Scalar Fluxes with Displaced Sensors?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0814:HCICEW>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage814
    journal lastpage821
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1997:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian