YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Trajectory Models for Heavy Particles in Atmospheric Turbulence: Comparison with Observations

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2000:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 011::page 1894
    Author:
    Wilson, John D.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1894:TMFHPI>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The simplest ?random flight? models for the paths of heavy particles in turbulence have been tested against previous observations of the deposition of glass beads from an elevated source in the atmospheric surface layer. For the bead sizes examined (diameter 50?100 ?m), for which the ratio of particle inertial timescale to turbulence timescale τp/ΓL ? 1, it was found sufficient to adapt, as others earlier have done, a well-mixed first-order Lagrangian stochastic (?Langevin?) model of fluid element trajectories, simply by superposing a gravitational settling velocity wg and reducing the velocity autocorrelation timescale along the heavy particle trajectory (Γp) relative to the fluid-Lagrangian timescale (ΓL). That is to say, unless details of the particle distribution very close to ground (where τp/ΓL is not small) are of interest, no advantage other than conceptual clarity can be found in the more faithful approach of explicitly modeling particle acceleration by means of the particle equation of motion. With the timescale reduction parameter ? ? 2, the Langevin model estimated the location and width of the bead deposit swath very well and fixed the peak deposit density to within (at worst) about 100% error (in very stable stratification), but more generally to within about 20%. In the case where trajectories intersected a tall crop canopy, uncertainties in the treatment of deposition proved more significant than nuances of the trajectory algorithm.
    • Download: (275.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Trajectory Models for Heavy Particles in Atmospheric Turbulence: Comparison with Observations

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148303
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilson, John D.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:07:36Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:07:36Z
    date copyright2000/11/01
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-12911.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148303
    description abstractThe simplest ?random flight? models for the paths of heavy particles in turbulence have been tested against previous observations of the deposition of glass beads from an elevated source in the atmospheric surface layer. For the bead sizes examined (diameter 50?100 ?m), for which the ratio of particle inertial timescale to turbulence timescale τp/ΓL ? 1, it was found sufficient to adapt, as others earlier have done, a well-mixed first-order Lagrangian stochastic (?Langevin?) model of fluid element trajectories, simply by superposing a gravitational settling velocity wg and reducing the velocity autocorrelation timescale along the heavy particle trajectory (Γp) relative to the fluid-Lagrangian timescale (ΓL). That is to say, unless details of the particle distribution very close to ground (where τp/ΓL is not small) are of interest, no advantage other than conceptual clarity can be found in the more faithful approach of explicitly modeling particle acceleration by means of the particle equation of motion. With the timescale reduction parameter ? ? 2, the Langevin model estimated the location and width of the bead deposit swath very well and fixed the peak deposit density to within (at worst) about 100% error (in very stable stratification), but more generally to within about 20%. In the case where trajectories intersected a tall crop canopy, uncertainties in the treatment of deposition proved more significant than nuances of the trajectory algorithm.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleTrajectory Models for Heavy Particles in Atmospheric Turbulence: Comparison with Observations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume39
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1894:TMFHPI>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1894
    journal lastpage1912
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2000:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian