YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Analysis of Darwin Rainfall Data: Implications on Sampling Strategy

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1996:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 003::page 372
    Author:
    Li, Qihang
    ,
    Bras, Rafael L.
    ,
    Veneziano, Daniele
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0372:AODRDI>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Rainfall data collected by radar in the vicinity of Darwin, Australia, have been analysed in terms of their mean, variance, autocorrelation of area-averaged rain rate, and diurnal variation. It is found that, when compared with the well-studied GATE (Global Atmospheric Research Program Atlantic Tropical Experiment) data, Darwin rainfall has larger coefficient of variation (CV), faster reduction of CV with increasing area size, weaker temporal correlation, and a strong diurnal cycle and intermittence. The coefficient of variation for Darwin rainfall has larger magnitude and exhibits larger spatial variability over the sea portion than over the land portion within the area of radar coverage. Stationary and nonstationary models have been used to study the sampling errors associated with space-based rainfall measurement. The nonstationary model shows that the sampling error is sensitive to the starting sampling time for some sampling frequencies, due to the diurnal cycle of rain, but not for others. Sampling experiments using data also show such sensitivity. When the errors are averaged over starting time, the results of the experiments and the stationary and nonstationary models match each other very closely. In the small areas for which data are available for both Darwin and GATE, the sampling error is expected to be larger for Darwin due to its larger CV.
    • Download: (950.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Analysis of Darwin Rainfall Data: Implications on Sampling Strategy

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4147606
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLi, Qihang
    contributor authorBras, Rafael L.
    contributor authorVeneziano, Daniele
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:05:39Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:05:39Z
    date copyright1996/03/01
    date issued1996
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-12284.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147606
    description abstractRainfall data collected by radar in the vicinity of Darwin, Australia, have been analysed in terms of their mean, variance, autocorrelation of area-averaged rain rate, and diurnal variation. It is found that, when compared with the well-studied GATE (Global Atmospheric Research Program Atlantic Tropical Experiment) data, Darwin rainfall has larger coefficient of variation (CV), faster reduction of CV with increasing area size, weaker temporal correlation, and a strong diurnal cycle and intermittence. The coefficient of variation for Darwin rainfall has larger magnitude and exhibits larger spatial variability over the sea portion than over the land portion within the area of radar coverage. Stationary and nonstationary models have been used to study the sampling errors associated with space-based rainfall measurement. The nonstationary model shows that the sampling error is sensitive to the starting sampling time for some sampling frequencies, due to the diurnal cycle of rain, but not for others. Sampling experiments using data also show such sensitivity. When the errors are averaged over starting time, the results of the experiments and the stationary and nonstationary models match each other very closely. In the small areas for which data are available for both Darwin and GATE, the sampling error is expected to be larger for Darwin due to its larger CV.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAnalysis of Darwin Rainfall Data: Implications on Sampling Strategy
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume35
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0372:AODRDI>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage372
    journal lastpage385
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1996:;volume( 035 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian