YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Interpolation Errors in Wind Fields as a Function of Spatial and Temporal Resolution and Their Impact on Different Types of Kinematic Trajectories

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1995:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 010::page 2149
    Author:
    Stohl, Andreas
    ,
    Wotawa, Gerhard
    ,
    Seibert, Petra
    ,
    Kromp-Kolb, Helga
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2149:IEIWFA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This paper discusses some of the uncertainties that influence kinematic trajectory calculations. The interpolation errors due to different interpolation schemes are examined by degrading high-resolution wind fields from a numerical weather prediction model with respect to space and time. Under typical circumstances, the greatest errors are due to temporal interpolation, followed by horizontal and vertical interpolation. Relative errors in the vertical wind are higher than those in the horizontal wind components. These errors are quite substantial and severely affect the accuracy of trajectories. For instance, a decrease of the temporal resolution from 3 to 6 h leads to average relative interpolation errors of 16% in the horizontal wind components and 40% in the vertical wind component. These errors cause mean transport deviations of 280 km for two-dimensional model-level trajectories and 600 km for three-dimensional trajectories after 96-h travel time. The substantial deviations for three-dimensional trajectories are due to the large interpolation errors of the vertical velocity component. Although the three-dimensional trajectories are more sensitive to interpolation errors, for sufficiently (though not ideally) resolved wind fields they seem to be superior to model-level trajectories. An intercomparison of three-dimensional, model-level, isentropic, and boundary layer trajectories is presented.
    • Download: (1.034Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Interpolation Errors in Wind Fields as a Function of Spatial and Temporal Resolution and Their Impact on Different Types of Kinematic Trajectories

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4147519
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStohl, Andreas
    contributor authorWotawa, Gerhard
    contributor authorSeibert, Petra
    contributor authorKromp-Kolb, Helga
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:05:22Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:05:22Z
    date copyright1995/10/01
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-12205.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147519
    description abstractThis paper discusses some of the uncertainties that influence kinematic trajectory calculations. The interpolation errors due to different interpolation schemes are examined by degrading high-resolution wind fields from a numerical weather prediction model with respect to space and time. Under typical circumstances, the greatest errors are due to temporal interpolation, followed by horizontal and vertical interpolation. Relative errors in the vertical wind are higher than those in the horizontal wind components. These errors are quite substantial and severely affect the accuracy of trajectories. For instance, a decrease of the temporal resolution from 3 to 6 h leads to average relative interpolation errors of 16% in the horizontal wind components and 40% in the vertical wind component. These errors cause mean transport deviations of 280 km for two-dimensional model-level trajectories and 600 km for three-dimensional trajectories after 96-h travel time. The substantial deviations for three-dimensional trajectories are due to the large interpolation errors of the vertical velocity component. Although the three-dimensional trajectories are more sensitive to interpolation errors, for sufficiently (though not ideally) resolved wind fields they seem to be superior to model-level trajectories. An intercomparison of three-dimensional, model-level, isentropic, and boundary layer trajectories is presented.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleInterpolation Errors in Wind Fields as a Function of Spatial and Temporal Resolution and Their Impact on Different Types of Kinematic Trajectories
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2149:IEIWFA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2149
    journal lastpage2165
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1995:;volume( 034 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian