YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Simulation Study of the Bias Error Analysis of Mean Rainfall Rates Measured with Spaceborne Radar

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1996:;volume( 013 ):;issue: 003::page 762
    Author:
    Ohsaki, Yuji
    ,
    Nakamura, Kenji
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0762:ASSOTB>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Spaceborne rain radars often operate with a fairly low SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) because of several hardware limitations and the large distance between the radar and target. Rain radar do not directly measure the rain echo power but instead the total received power, which is the sum of the rain echo power and the receiver noise power. The rain echo power is obtained by taking the difference between the total received power and the receiver noise power. The experimentally obtained rain echo power is sometimes a negative value when the SNR is low. The rainfall rate cannot be directly estimated from this negative data. This paper proposes three data processings (truncation, zero rain, and negative rain methods) for mean rainfall rate estimations from rain echo data that includes data with a negative value. The bias error analysis for the three methods is done by computer simulation. The bias error from truncation is fairly large compared with that caused by the other two methods. When the receiver noise power is small, the zero rain method, which gives relatively small bias error, will be useful. When the receiver noise power is large, the negative rain method, which effectively reduces the bias error, will be useful. Another feature of the negative rain method is that it automatically cancels the effect of misidentification of rain or no-rain.
    • Download: (581.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Simulation Study of the Bias Error Analysis of Mean Rainfall Rates Measured with Spaceborne Radar

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4147023
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorOhsaki, Yuji
    contributor authorNakamura, Kenji
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:03:49Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:03:49Z
    date copyright1996/06/01
    date issued1996
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1176.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4147023
    description abstractSpaceborne rain radars often operate with a fairly low SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) because of several hardware limitations and the large distance between the radar and target. Rain radar do not directly measure the rain echo power but instead the total received power, which is the sum of the rain echo power and the receiver noise power. The rain echo power is obtained by taking the difference between the total received power and the receiver noise power. The experimentally obtained rain echo power is sometimes a negative value when the SNR is low. The rainfall rate cannot be directly estimated from this negative data. This paper proposes three data processings (truncation, zero rain, and negative rain methods) for mean rainfall rate estimations from rain echo data that includes data with a negative value. The bias error analysis for the three methods is done by computer simulation. The bias error from truncation is fairly large compared with that caused by the other two methods. When the receiver noise power is small, the zero rain method, which gives relatively small bias error, will be useful. When the receiver noise power is large, the negative rain method, which effectively reduces the bias error, will be useful. Another feature of the negative rain method is that it automatically cancels the effect of misidentification of rain or no-rain.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Simulation Study of the Bias Error Analysis of Mean Rainfall Rates Measured with Spaceborne Radar
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0762:ASSOTB>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage762
    journal lastpage768
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1996:;volume( 013 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian