YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Springtime Visibility in the Arctic

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1991:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003::page 342
    Author:
    Meyer, F. G.
    ,
    Curry, J. A.
    ,
    Brock, C. A.
    ,
    Radke, L. F.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0342:SVITA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Since the Ptarmigan flights in the 1950s, the springtime visibility reduction in the Arctic has been identified with pollution aerosol. However, observed values of the dry aerosol extinction coefficient are too small to explain the observed visibility reductions. Water uptake by the aerosol appears to be an important component of the Arctic turbidity. Furthermore, the presence of lower-tropospheric ice crystals may have a dominant effect on the visibility in the Arctic. Data obtained from a series of meteorological, chemical, and cloud microphysical measurements made by the University of Washington research aircraft during April 1983 and 1986 are used as input for a visibility model. The model calculates the water uptake by the dry aerosols as a function of relative humidity and determines the single-scattering properties of the aerosols and the ice crystals. Path radiances are calculated using an extension to the delta-Eddington approximation introduced by Hering. Modeled visual ranges indicate that aerosols alone cannot account for the low visibilities. In certain cases, the inclusion of ice crystals along with the aerosols can produce visual ranges which are as low as those observed. A comparison between visual ranges obtained using the model and estimated using Koschmieder's equation showed that Koschmieder's equation will generally underestimate the visual range.
    • Download: (1.245Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Springtime Visibility in the Arctic

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4146914
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMeyer, F. G.
    contributor authorCurry, J. A.
    contributor authorBrock, C. A.
    contributor authorRadke, L. F.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:03:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:03:27Z
    date copyright1991/03/01
    date issued1991
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-11661.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4146914
    description abstractSince the Ptarmigan flights in the 1950s, the springtime visibility reduction in the Arctic has been identified with pollution aerosol. However, observed values of the dry aerosol extinction coefficient are too small to explain the observed visibility reductions. Water uptake by the aerosol appears to be an important component of the Arctic turbidity. Furthermore, the presence of lower-tropospheric ice crystals may have a dominant effect on the visibility in the Arctic. Data obtained from a series of meteorological, chemical, and cloud microphysical measurements made by the University of Washington research aircraft during April 1983 and 1986 are used as input for a visibility model. The model calculates the water uptake by the dry aerosols as a function of relative humidity and determines the single-scattering properties of the aerosols and the ice crystals. Path radiances are calculated using an extension to the delta-Eddington approximation introduced by Hering. Modeled visual ranges indicate that aerosols alone cannot account for the low visibilities. In certain cases, the inclusion of ice crystals along with the aerosols can produce visual ranges which are as low as those observed. A comparison between visual ranges obtained using the model and estimated using Koschmieder's equation showed that Koschmieder's equation will generally underestimate the visual range.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSpringtime Visibility in the Arctic
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0342:SVITA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage342
    journal lastpage357
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1991:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian