YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1990:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 010::page 994
    Author:
    Allen, Robert C.
    ,
    Durkee, Philip A.
    ,
    Wash, Carlyle H.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snow-free land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 ?m), 3 (3.7 ?m), and 4 (11.0 ?m). Reflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six case were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.
    • Download: (1.101Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Snow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4146851
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAllen, Robert C.
    contributor authorDurkee, Philip A.
    contributor authorWash, Carlyle H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:03:14Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:03:14Z
    date copyright1990/10/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-11604.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4146851
    description abstractAn algorithm is developed and evaluated for discriminating between clouds, snow-covered land and snow-free land in satellite image data. The multispectral technique uses daytime images of NOAA AVHRR channels 1 (0.63 ?m), 3 (3.7 ?m), and 4 (11.0 ?m). Reflectance is derived for channel 3 by using the channel 4 emission temperature to estimate and remove the channel 3 thermal emission. Separation of clouds from snow and land is based primarily on the derived channel 3 reflectance. Observed reflectance in channel 3 is 0.02 to 0.04 for snow, 0.03 to 0.10 for land, 0.02 to 0.27 for ice clouds and 0.08 to 0.36 for liquid clouds. These ranges overlap for thin cirrus and snow, so the routine attempts analysis of cirrus based on differences in transmission between channels 3 and 4. Six case were analyzed and the total cloud cover was verified against a total of 110 surface observations in the standard categories of clear, scattered, broken and overcast. One of the cases is presented in detail to illustrate the algorithm procedures and results. Analysis of cloud cover from the satellite algorithm matched surface observations at 55% of the stations and was one category different at 33% of the stations. The algorithm differed from the surface observations by two categories at 9% of the stations and by three categories at 4% of the stations. A major remaining problem is discrimination between ice clouds and snow cover.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSnow/Cloud Discrimination with Multispectral Satellite Measurements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume29
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0994:SDWMSM>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage994
    journal lastpage1004
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1990:;volume( 029 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian