YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Simulations Exploring the Dependence of Cloud-Cover Frequency Distribution on Cloud Size and Image Pixel Resolution

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1995:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 004::page 712
    Author:
    Luo, Gang
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0712:SETDOC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The dependence of pixel-scale cloud-cover frequency distribution on cloud size and pixel size is examined through Monte Carlo simulations. A shape parameter, which describes the shape of the frequency distribution, is found to be a simple function of the ratio of cloud size to pixel size. The form of the frequency distribution changes from U shape to bell shape when the ratio decreases. It becomes uniform when the ratio is about 0.8?0.9 for the cases where the regional-scale cloud cover is 0.5. It is shown that on average the cloud cover in partially cloudy pixels increases with increasing regional-scale cloud cover when the ratio of cloud size to pixel size is small. It becomes insensitive to regional-scale cloud cover when the ratio becomes large. It is also shown that, in comparison with the results from Monte Carlo simulations, the grid-scale cloud-cover frequency distribution obtained using a threshold method tends to be more U shaped, and that obtained using a method that assigns 50% cloudiness to partially cloudy pixels tends to be less U shaped, particularly for subgrid cloudiness. A possible way of retrieving cloud size is suggested. It is found that the difference between a simulated cloud field, where clouds are uniformly distributed, and a real cloud field, where clouds may not be uniformly distributed, biases cloud size retrieval. Investigations on how clouds are distributed in a real cloud field are recommended.
    • Download: (801.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Simulations Exploring the Dependence of Cloud-Cover Frequency Distribution on Cloud Size and Image Pixel Resolution

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4145779
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLuo, Gang
    date accessioned2017-06-09T13:59:55Z
    date available2017-06-09T13:59:55Z
    date copyright1995/08/01
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1064.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4145779
    description abstractThe dependence of pixel-scale cloud-cover frequency distribution on cloud size and pixel size is examined through Monte Carlo simulations. A shape parameter, which describes the shape of the frequency distribution, is found to be a simple function of the ratio of cloud size to pixel size. The form of the frequency distribution changes from U shape to bell shape when the ratio decreases. It becomes uniform when the ratio is about 0.8?0.9 for the cases where the regional-scale cloud cover is 0.5. It is shown that on average the cloud cover in partially cloudy pixels increases with increasing regional-scale cloud cover when the ratio of cloud size to pixel size is small. It becomes insensitive to regional-scale cloud cover when the ratio becomes large. It is also shown that, in comparison with the results from Monte Carlo simulations, the grid-scale cloud-cover frequency distribution obtained using a threshold method tends to be more U shaped, and that obtained using a method that assigns 50% cloudiness to partially cloudy pixels tends to be less U shaped, particularly for subgrid cloudiness. A possible way of retrieving cloud size is suggested. It is found that the difference between a simulated cloud field, where clouds are uniformly distributed, and a real cloud field, where clouds may not be uniformly distributed, biases cloud size retrieval. Investigations on how clouds are distributed in a real cloud field are recommended.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSimulations Exploring the Dependence of Cloud-Cover Frequency Distribution on Cloud Size and Image Pixel Resolution
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0712:SETDOC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage712
    journal lastpage720
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1995:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian