YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rainfall Measurement Accuracy in FACE: A Comparison of Gage and Radar Rainfalls

    Source: Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1983:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 012::page 2038
    Author:
    Barnston, Anthony G.
    ,
    Thomas, Jack L.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<2038:RMAIFA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The agreement of radar with raingage rainfall measurements during the second phase of the Florida Area Cumulus Experiment (FACE-2) is examined. FACE-2 rainfall was measured in a 1.3 ? 104 km2 target area using 111 nearly uniformly distributed gages at an average density of 117 km2 per gage and using a WSR-57 radar adjusted daily with a dense raingage network distributed over 500 km2. The radar versus gage agreement is studied in order to evaluate the accuracy of the unadjusted radar measurements and the effectiveness of the adjustment technique in improving the radar measurements. Implicit in the comparison is an assumption that the gage rainfalls are the relative standard of accuracy. Before gage adjustment of the radar rainfalls, mean differences between radar and gage target area rainfalls are slightly positive (radar ? 1.10 ? gage) on dry days but become considerably negative (radar ? 0.70 ? gage) on wet days. Following gage adjustment, the mean agreement generally is much improved. However, the day-to-day variation of the differences is not diminished after the adjustment. This is attributed to misrepresentations of the gage-to-radar rainfall ratio in the dense raingage network which are caused by the spatial variation of that ratio within the overall target area.
    • Download: (1.295Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rainfall Measurement Accuracy in FACE: A Comparison of Gage and Radar Rainfalls

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4145766
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBarnston, Anthony G.
    contributor authorThomas, Jack L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T13:59:53Z
    date available2017-06-09T13:59:53Z
    date copyright1983/12/01
    date issued1983
    identifier issn0733-3021
    identifier otherams-10628.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4145766
    description abstractThe agreement of radar with raingage rainfall measurements during the second phase of the Florida Area Cumulus Experiment (FACE-2) is examined. FACE-2 rainfall was measured in a 1.3 ? 104 km2 target area using 111 nearly uniformly distributed gages at an average density of 117 km2 per gage and using a WSR-57 radar adjusted daily with a dense raingage network distributed over 500 km2. The radar versus gage agreement is studied in order to evaluate the accuracy of the unadjusted radar measurements and the effectiveness of the adjustment technique in improving the radar measurements. Implicit in the comparison is an assumption that the gage rainfalls are the relative standard of accuracy. Before gage adjustment of the radar rainfalls, mean differences between radar and gage target area rainfalls are slightly positive (radar ? 1.10 ? gage) on dry days but become considerably negative (radar ? 0.70 ? gage) on wet days. Following gage adjustment, the mean agreement generally is much improved. However, the day-to-day variation of the differences is not diminished after the adjustment. This is attributed to misrepresentations of the gage-to-radar rainfall ratio in the dense raingage network which are caused by the spatial variation of that ratio within the overall target area.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleRainfall Measurement Accuracy in FACE: A Comparison of Gage and Radar Rainfalls
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume22
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<2038:RMAIFA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2038
    journal lastpage2052
    treeJournal of Climate and Applied Meteorology:;1983:;volume( 022 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian