Show simple item record

contributor authorJames E. Dailey
contributor authorJay B. Weidler, Jr.
contributor authorShaddy Y. Hanna
contributor authorMohamed F. Zedan
contributor authorJimmy Y. Yeung
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:09:06Z
date available2017-05-08T21:09:06Z
date copyrightMay 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290733-950x%281987%29113%3A3%28233%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40582
description abstractMotion response calculation procedures are described for a vertical, singly standing pile with no top restraint. Discussion is directed to: (1) Sea state energy distribution versus frequency; (2) hydrodynamic force formulation; and (3) synchronization between pile natural frequency and vortex shedding frequency in wave flows. A nondimensional plot of in‐line hydrodynamic force suggests that experimentally based force coefficient values used in the analysis provide a reasonable to conservative force estimate when vortices were formed but not shed during 90% of the construction period. Sensitivity studies with alternative lift force formulations suggest that significant motion response and substantial fatigue damage occurred due to vortex shedding synchronization during the peak of the December 4–6, 1974 storm.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePile Fatigue Failures. III: Motions in Seas
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1987)113:3(233)
treeJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record