YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multiobjective Optimization of Rehabilitation and Leakage Detection Scheduling in Water Distribution Systems

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Stefano Alvisi
    ,
    Marco Franchini
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(426)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents a procedure for optimal medium-term scheduling (e.g., over a time window of 5 years) of rehabilitation and leakage detection interventions in a water distribution system given predetermined budget constraints. The decisional variables are the interventions to be scheduled, that is, which pipes to replace and when (in which year), and where and when (in which zone and year) to carry out leakage detection surveys, while the objectives are to minimize the volumes of water lost and break repair costs. The optimizer used is the NSGA II multiobjective genetic algorithm. It is assumed that the budget allocated for leakage detection and pipe rehabilitation (proactive interventions) represents a separate expenditure item from that for the repair of breaks (reactive interventions). In particular, whereas repair costs are subject to minimization, the budget for proactive interventions is allocated on a yearly basis during the scheduling period and a constraint is determined by the fact that the amounts budgeted must be completely spent, year after year: this reflects the customary practice of water utilities, which strive to spend the entire budget available to them, since any residual amount may not be reallocated to the same expenditure item in the year or years to come. The multiobjective optimization procedure does not produce one optimal solution, but rather the Pareto front of nondominated solutions. Some considerations for identifying a range of solutions within this front, from which to choose the one to apply, are thus discussed. The procedure is applied to a real water distribution system using advanced models to represent the various processes that characterize the problem, namely, leakages as a function of pipe age and pressure, actual nodal discharges released as a function of head, time series of pipe breaks, etc. and the results obtained show that the proposed procedure may be a useful decision support tool for scheduling leakage detection campaigns and rehabilitation interventions.
    • Download: (305.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multiobjective Optimization of Rehabilitation and Leakage Detection Scheduling in Water Distribution Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/40245
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStefano Alvisi
    contributor authorMarco Franchini
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:08:28Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:08:28Z
    date copyrightNovember 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282009%29135%3A6%28426%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40245
    description abstractThis paper presents a procedure for optimal medium-term scheduling (e.g., over a time window of 5 years) of rehabilitation and leakage detection interventions in a water distribution system given predetermined budget constraints. The decisional variables are the interventions to be scheduled, that is, which pipes to replace and when (in which year), and where and when (in which zone and year) to carry out leakage detection surveys, while the objectives are to minimize the volumes of water lost and break repair costs. The optimizer used is the NSGA II multiobjective genetic algorithm. It is assumed that the budget allocated for leakage detection and pipe rehabilitation (proactive interventions) represents a separate expenditure item from that for the repair of breaks (reactive interventions). In particular, whereas repair costs are subject to minimization, the budget for proactive interventions is allocated on a yearly basis during the scheduling period and a constraint is determined by the fact that the amounts budgeted must be completely spent, year after year: this reflects the customary practice of water utilities, which strive to spend the entire budget available to them, since any residual amount may not be reallocated to the same expenditure item in the year or years to come. The multiobjective optimization procedure does not produce one optimal solution, but rather the Pareto front of nondominated solutions. Some considerations for identifying a range of solutions within this front, from which to choose the one to apply, are thus discussed. The procedure is applied to a real water distribution system using advanced models to represent the various processes that characterize the problem, namely, leakages as a function of pipe age and pressure, actual nodal discharges released as a function of head, time series of pipe breaks, etc. and the results obtained show that the proposed procedure may be a useful decision support tool for scheduling leakage detection campaigns and rehabilitation interventions.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleMultiobjective Optimization of Rehabilitation and Leakage Detection Scheduling in Water Distribution Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume135
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(426)
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian