YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk and Resilience to Enhance Sustainability with Application to Urban Water Systems

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Jane M. Blackmore
    ,
    Roel A. J. Plant
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Many cities in water-stressed environments are seeking sustainable alternatives to traditional solutions such as supply augmentation and water restrictions. One alternative is to upgrade urban water systems in an integrated manner. Design of an integrated urban water system (IUWS) requires an understanding of the risk of the IUWS failing to deliver sustainable outcomes. We present a rationale for enhancing well-established risk assessment and management tools with concepts of ecosystem resilience. Although traditional risk assessment focuses on the states of controls that operate on specific system components and the likelihood and consequences of control failure, resilience theory addresses whole-of-system behavior. In identifying critical controls, risk management focuses on the ability to prevent failure and stabilize a certain system state, whereas resilience focuses on the “uncontrollable” to identify pathways for managing system adaptation to change. Based on conceptual analysis of two key resilience metaphors, the “stability landscape” and the “adaptive cycle,” we investigate pathways toward risk-based IUWS design and management that explicitly include system resilience as an overarching measure of sustainability. Areas for future research include development of methodologies for measuring system adaptive capacity, and identifying and quantifying emerging thresholds. The challenge for the risk assessment community is to reconsider what “risk” is: In a resilience context, events traditionally seen as risky are not necessarily bad, and may become opportunities. The challenge for the resilience community is to identify thresholds and the system’s proximity to them.
    • Download: (413.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Risk and Resilience to Enhance Sustainability with Application to Urban Water Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/40148
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJane M. Blackmore
    contributor authorRoel A. J. Plant
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:08:21Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:08:21Z
    date copyrightMay 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282008%29134%3A3%28224%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/40148
    description abstractMany cities in water-stressed environments are seeking sustainable alternatives to traditional solutions such as supply augmentation and water restrictions. One alternative is to upgrade urban water systems in an integrated manner. Design of an integrated urban water system (IUWS) requires an understanding of the risk of the IUWS failing to deliver sustainable outcomes. We present a rationale for enhancing well-established risk assessment and management tools with concepts of ecosystem resilience. Although traditional risk assessment focuses on the states of controls that operate on specific system components and the likelihood and consequences of control failure, resilience theory addresses whole-of-system behavior. In identifying critical controls, risk management focuses on the ability to prevent failure and stabilize a certain system state, whereas resilience focuses on the “uncontrollable” to identify pathways for managing system adaptation to change. Based on conceptual analysis of two key resilience metaphors, the “stability landscape” and the “adaptive cycle,” we investigate pathways toward risk-based IUWS design and management that explicitly include system resilience as an overarching measure of sustainability. Areas for future research include development of methodologies for measuring system adaptive capacity, and identifying and quantifying emerging thresholds. The challenge for the risk assessment community is to reconsider what “risk” is: In a resilience context, events traditionally seen as risky are not necessarily bad, and may become opportunities. The challenge for the resilience community is to identify thresholds and the system’s proximity to them.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRisk and Resilience to Enhance Sustainability with Application to Urban Water Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume134
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2008:;Volume ( 134 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian