YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance, Cost, and Maintenance Requirements of Austin Sand Filters

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Michael E. Barrett
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(234)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Five Austin-style sand filters were constructed by the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) as retrofit projects for maintenance yards and park-and-ride facilities in the Los Angeles and San Diego metropolitan areas. Each of these filter systems included storm-water monitoring equipment for collection of flow weighted composite samples. In addition, detailed records were compiled of the design elements, construction costs, and type and amount of maintenance required at each of the sites. The construction costs were relatively high because of the retrofit nature of the project and the integration of the CALTRANS storm-drain system with those of the adjoining metropolitan areas, which eliminated any opportunities for economies of scale. An analysis of performance using linear-regression techniques indicated that for sediment and almost all particle associated constituents, effluent concentration was independent of influent concentration. For instance, the average suspended solids concentration in treated runoff was 7.8±1.2 mg/L (at the 90% confidence level) regardless of observed influent concentration. The constant effluent quality produced for the particulate constituents indicates that the calculation of a percent reduction is more indicative of the influent concentration rather than the performance of the filter itself. Rejuvenation of the filter bed was required at three sites after 3 years of operation when the solids loading to the system was between 5 and 7.5 kg/m
    • Download: (148.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance, Cost, and Maintenance Requirements of Austin Sand Filters

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/39826
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMichael E. Barrett
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:07:52Z
    date copyrightMay 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%282003%29129%3A3%28234%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39826
    description abstractFive Austin-style sand filters were constructed by the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) as retrofit projects for maintenance yards and park-and-ride facilities in the Los Angeles and San Diego metropolitan areas. Each of these filter systems included storm-water monitoring equipment for collection of flow weighted composite samples. In addition, detailed records were compiled of the design elements, construction costs, and type and amount of maintenance required at each of the sites. The construction costs were relatively high because of the retrofit nature of the project and the integration of the CALTRANS storm-drain system with those of the adjoining metropolitan areas, which eliminated any opportunities for economies of scale. An analysis of performance using linear-regression techniques indicated that for sediment and almost all particle associated constituents, effluent concentration was independent of influent concentration. For instance, the average suspended solids concentration in treated runoff was 7.8±1.2 mg/L (at the 90% confidence level) regardless of observed influent concentration. The constant effluent quality produced for the particulate constituents indicates that the calculation of a percent reduction is more indicative of the influent concentration rather than the performance of the filter itself. Rejuvenation of the filter bed was required at three sites after 3 years of operation when the solids loading to the system was between 5 and 7.5 kg/m
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePerformance, Cost, and Maintenance Requirements of Austin Sand Filters
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(234)
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian