Show simple item record

contributor authorBancha Kwanyuen
contributor authorDarrell G. Fontane
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:26Z
date available2017-05-08T21:07:26Z
date copyrightMay 1998
date issued1998
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281998%29124%3A3%28140%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39525
description abstractA ground water development planning problem considering the minimization of both fixed installation and variable operation costs is formulated using the response matrix method. This mixed integer, nonlinear problem is solved using penalty coefficient (PC) methods, the pseudointeger method (PIM), and a heuristic branch-and-bound (HBB) method. An HBB technique was developed based upon combining the concepts of the branch-and-bound method with heuristic knowledge about the potential pumping yield of pumping cells. All methods were applied to test problems and their performance compared using accuracy, computation time, and memory requirements as criteria. Although the HBB method was not as computationally efficient as the other methods, it was more robust in finding the optimal solution, particularly for problems with more than three time periods. The HBB method was applied for long-term multiobjective planning to the Sukhothai Groundwater Project in Thailand. The problem was solved using multiobjective analysis based upon a combination of the ε-constraint method and compromise programming.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHeuristic Branch-and-Bound Method for Ground Water Development Planning
typeJournal Paper
journal volume124
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1998)124:3(140)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1998:;Volume ( 124 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record