YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation System Optimization

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Daene C. McKinney
    ,
    Min-Der Lin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:2(128)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A ground-water management model using a nonlinear programming algorithm was developed to find the minimum cost design of the combined pumping and treatment components of a pump-and-treat remediation system and includes the fixed costs of system construction and installation as well as operation and maintenance. The fixed-cost terms of the objective function are incorporated into the nonlinear programming formulation using a penalty coefficient method. Results of applying the model to an aquifer with homogeneous hydraulic conductivity show that a combined well field and treatment process model that includes fixed costs has a significant impact on the design and cost of these systems, reducing the cost by using fewer, larger-flow-rate wells. Previous pump-and-treat design formulations have resulted in systems with numerous, low-flow-rate wells due to the use of simplified cost functions that do not exhibit economies of scale or fixed costs. Two example aquifers with heterogeneous conductivity fields were also investigated, and system costs similar to the homogeneous case were obtained. However, the introduction of aquifer heterogeneity did affect the remediation design, for example, well locations and pumping rates. Trade-offs between total remediation system cost and cleanup standard, remediation period, and typical design parameters of air-stripping towers are examined through sensitivity analysis. Generally, the optimal injection concentration is found to be approximately 70–80% of the cleanup standard. Designs with remediation periods around 5–6 yr have the minimum cost for the case study presented in this paper. Remediation periods beyond 6 yr are not economically justified, since the tower operating costs become dominant and offset the reduction of capital cost.
    • Download: (1.166Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation System Optimization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/39405
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDaene C. McKinney
    contributor authorMin-Der Lin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:12Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:07:12Z
    date copyrightMarch 1996
    date issued1996
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281996%29122%3A2%28128%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39405
    description abstractA ground-water management model using a nonlinear programming algorithm was developed to find the minimum cost design of the combined pumping and treatment components of a pump-and-treat remediation system and includes the fixed costs of system construction and installation as well as operation and maintenance. The fixed-cost terms of the objective function are incorporated into the nonlinear programming formulation using a penalty coefficient method. Results of applying the model to an aquifer with homogeneous hydraulic conductivity show that a combined well field and treatment process model that includes fixed costs has a significant impact on the design and cost of these systems, reducing the cost by using fewer, larger-flow-rate wells. Previous pump-and-treat design formulations have resulted in systems with numerous, low-flow-rate wells due to the use of simplified cost functions that do not exhibit economies of scale or fixed costs. Two example aquifers with heterogeneous conductivity fields were also investigated, and system costs similar to the homogeneous case were obtained. However, the introduction of aquifer heterogeneity did affect the remediation design, for example, well locations and pumping rates. Trade-offs between total remediation system cost and cleanup standard, remediation period, and typical design parameters of air-stripping towers are examined through sensitivity analysis. Generally, the optimal injection concentration is found to be approximately 70–80% of the cleanup standard. Designs with remediation periods around 5–6 yr have the minimum cost for the case study presented in this paper. Remediation periods beyond 6 yr are not economically justified, since the tower operating costs become dominant and offset the reduction of capital cost.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePump-and-Treat Ground-Water Remediation System Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:2(128)
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian