YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Robust Optimal Design for Wastewater Treatment. Part II: Application

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    James G. Uber
    ,
    John T. Pfeffer
    ,
    E. Downey Brill, Jr.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1991)117:4(438)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A general approach, called robust optimal design, is developed in a companion paper and applied here to a comprehensive, nonlinear, activated sludge treatment system. The treatment system robustness is related to the sensitivity of steady‐state effluent biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids concentrations to changes in 55 uncertain model parameter values. Treatment system designs with lower sensitivity of the effluent water quality measures are likely to be more robust than designs with higher sensitivity. The robust optimal design approach is used to generate alternative designs that represent the trade‐off between total system cost and robustness. The robust design trends are generally more consistent with recommended design practice than are typical minimum‐cost design trends. In particular, improvements in the robustness of effluent biochemical oxygen demand concentration are associated with higher activated sludge mean solids‐residence times, whereas typical minimum‐cost designs are associated with low solids‐residence times. The robustness of the alternative designs is evaluated further using a nonlinear worst‐case analysis. The robust optimal design framework should be applicable to many design problems where uncertainty in parameter values is significant.
    • Download: (1.098Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Robust Optimal Design for Wastewater Treatment. Part II: Application

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/39364
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJames G. Uber
    contributor authorJohn T. Pfeffer
    contributor authorE. Downey Brill, Jr.
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:08Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:07:08Z
    date copyrightJuly 1991
    date issued1991
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%281991%29117%3A4%28438%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39364
    description abstractA general approach, called robust optimal design, is developed in a companion paper and applied here to a comprehensive, nonlinear, activated sludge treatment system. The treatment system robustness is related to the sensitivity of steady‐state effluent biochemical oxygen demand and total suspended solids concentrations to changes in 55 uncertain model parameter values. Treatment system designs with lower sensitivity of the effluent water quality measures are likely to be more robust than designs with higher sensitivity. The robust optimal design approach is used to generate alternative designs that represent the trade‐off between total system cost and robustness. The robust design trends are generally more consistent with recommended design practice than are typical minimum‐cost design trends. In particular, improvements in the robustness of effluent biochemical oxygen demand concentration are associated with higher activated sludge mean solids‐residence times, whereas typical minimum‐cost designs are associated with low solids‐residence times. The robustness of the alternative designs is evaluated further using a nonlinear worst‐case analysis. The robust optimal design framework should be applicable to many design problems where uncertainty in parameter values is significant.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRobust Optimal Design for Wastewater Treatment. Part II: Application
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume117
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1991)117:4(438)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian