YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Lessons Learned on Jointed Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies in Texas

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Dar Hao Chen
    ,
    Tom Scullion
    ,
    John Bilyeu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(257)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Reflective cracking through jointed concrete pavement overlays has been a persistent problem. Several different rehabilitation strategies have been used in Texas. This paper is a summary of the performance of strategies used in the past 10 years. The performance of the crack-retarding grid has been disappointing as it has been related to several premature failures. Only one project has realized a benefit of the crack-retarding grid, where the reflective cracking was delayed by about 1 year. The writers believe the small openings in the crack-retarding grid and the lack of an effective bond may be the causes of the layer separation. A proprietary crack-retarding asphalt material has been performing well over two years of monitoring. In one experimental project, 100% of the cracks reflected through conventional overlay material in the first year. Both Petromat fabric underseal and crack-retarding asphalt material have been performing satisfactorily to retard reflective cracking. However, there is a large cost difference between these two treatments. Seven experimental treatments on a major section of US 59 were evaluated. The worst-performing section on the US 59 project was the break-and-seat method, which failed due to weak subgrade support. The weak subgrade is unable to support cracked concrete, which leads to a rocking action under traffic loads. It is concluded that for future projects, the break-and-seat method should not be applied on subgrade with a dynamic cone penetrometer penetration rate exceeding 25 mm per blow. A flexible base overlay with thin asphalt surfacing and the Arkansas (large stone) mix have performed well. Flexible base overlays were able to absorb the joint movement and eliminate the reflective cracking. The flexible base should be of top quality with very low moisture susceptibility. In Texas, this involves specifying a Texas triaxial Class 1 material with classification of “good” in suction/dielectric tests. It is also critical to provide an effective seal for the flexible base. A chip seal followed by a thin 75-mm hot mix layer is recommended.
    • Download: (1.145Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Lessons Learned on Jointed Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies in Texas

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/37860
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDar Hao Chen
    contributor authorTom Scullion
    contributor authorJohn Bilyeu
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:04:48Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:04:48Z
    date copyrightMarch 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%282006%29132%3A3%28257%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37860
    description abstractReflective cracking through jointed concrete pavement overlays has been a persistent problem. Several different rehabilitation strategies have been used in Texas. This paper is a summary of the performance of strategies used in the past 10 years. The performance of the crack-retarding grid has been disappointing as it has been related to several premature failures. Only one project has realized a benefit of the crack-retarding grid, where the reflective cracking was delayed by about 1 year. The writers believe the small openings in the crack-retarding grid and the lack of an effective bond may be the causes of the layer separation. A proprietary crack-retarding asphalt material has been performing well over two years of monitoring. In one experimental project, 100% of the cracks reflected through conventional overlay material in the first year. Both Petromat fabric underseal and crack-retarding asphalt material have been performing satisfactorily to retard reflective cracking. However, there is a large cost difference between these two treatments. Seven experimental treatments on a major section of US 59 were evaluated. The worst-performing section on the US 59 project was the break-and-seat method, which failed due to weak subgrade support. The weak subgrade is unable to support cracked concrete, which leads to a rocking action under traffic loads. It is concluded that for future projects, the break-and-seat method should not be applied on subgrade with a dynamic cone penetrometer penetration rate exceeding 25 mm per blow. A flexible base overlay with thin asphalt surfacing and the Arkansas (large stone) mix have performed well. Flexible base overlays were able to absorb the joint movement and eliminate the reflective cracking. The flexible base should be of top quality with very low moisture susceptibility. In Texas, this involves specifying a Texas triaxial Class 1 material with classification of “good” in suction/dielectric tests. It is also critical to provide an effective seal for the flexible base. A chip seal followed by a thin 75-mm hot mix layer is recommended.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLessons Learned on Jointed Concrete Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies in Texas
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(257)
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian