YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Vehicle Level Evaluation of Loop Detectors and the Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Benjamin Coifman
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(213)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Traffic detectors support most traffic management applications, so it is important that a detector performs as expected. This study evaluates the performance of four loop sensor models and the remote traffic microwave sensor (RTMS), adding to the body of sensor performance knowledge through the use of new analytical techniques. The study collected contact closure data from all five of the detectors and concurrent video data. Each loop sensor was deployed following Caltrans guidelines for at least 24 h across dual loop detectors in each lane of I-80, north of Oakland, Calif. The research examined various distributions of the individual vehicle actuations from each of the detectors. This exercise found some of the loop sensors locked up and did not provide any data to the controller although they appeared fully functional from the front panel. The sensitivity appears to vary between the RTMS and the loop sensors, as well as from one loop sensor model to the next, which means the occupancy measurements will also change. Detailed analysis of the sensors used the video to manually validate each vehicle passage over extended periods, preselected at random, with the errors classified by type (e.g., nondetected vehicle) and source (e.g., due to a lane change maneuver). As presented herein, the RTMS exhibited problems due to occlusion and reflections, while two of the loop sensors exhibited non-negligible problems. Finally, the methodology used in this paper can easily be extended to validate other detectors and detection technologies.
    • Download: (1.662Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Vehicle Level Evaluation of Loop Detectors and the Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/37856
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBenjamin Coifman
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:04:47Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:04:47Z
    date copyrightMarch 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%282006%29132%3A3%28213%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/37856
    description abstractTraffic detectors support most traffic management applications, so it is important that a detector performs as expected. This study evaluates the performance of four loop sensor models and the remote traffic microwave sensor (RTMS), adding to the body of sensor performance knowledge through the use of new analytical techniques. The study collected contact closure data from all five of the detectors and concurrent video data. Each loop sensor was deployed following Caltrans guidelines for at least 24 h across dual loop detectors in each lane of I-80, north of Oakland, Calif. The research examined various distributions of the individual vehicle actuations from each of the detectors. This exercise found some of the loop sensors locked up and did not provide any data to the controller although they appeared fully functional from the front panel. The sensitivity appears to vary between the RTMS and the loop sensors, as well as from one loop sensor model to the next, which means the occupancy measurements will also change. Detailed analysis of the sensors used the video to manually validate each vehicle passage over extended periods, preselected at random, with the errors classified by type (e.g., nondetected vehicle) and source (e.g., due to a lane change maneuver). As presented herein, the RTMS exhibited problems due to occlusion and reflections, while two of the loop sensors exhibited non-negligible problems. Finally, the methodology used in this paper can easily be extended to validate other detectors and detection technologies.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleVehicle Level Evaluation of Loop Detectors and the Remote Traffic Microwave Sensor
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:3(213)
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian