Seismic Column Demands in Ductile Braced FramesSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 001Author:Paul W. Richards
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:1(33)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: In ductile braced frames, column seismic demands depend on the strength of ductile elements and yielding patterns that occur during earthquake loading. Column demands were investigated in buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs), special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs), and eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) with different heights (3, 9, and 18 story) and strength levels using nonlinear time history analysis. For columns at the base of 9- and 18-story BRBFs and EBFs, axial demands observed from the analyses were 55–70% of demands commonly used in design, indicating potential cost savings on columns, anchor rods, base plates, and foundations in tall buildings; however, in low-rise SCBFs with braces in the 2-story X-configuration, column axial demands were up to 100% greater than those commonly used in design because of force redistribution that occurs after brace buckling. Column rotations in all frames were less than
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Paul W. Richards | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:00:44Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T21:00:44Z | |
date copyright | January 2009 | |
date issued | 2009 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%282009%29135%3A1%2833%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/35338 | |
description abstract | In ductile braced frames, column seismic demands depend on the strength of ductile elements and yielding patterns that occur during earthquake loading. Column demands were investigated in buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs), special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs), and eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) with different heights (3, 9, and 18 story) and strength levels using nonlinear time history analysis. For columns at the base of 9- and 18-story BRBFs and EBFs, axial demands observed from the analyses were 55–70% of demands commonly used in design, indicating potential cost savings on columns, anchor rods, base plates, and foundations in tall buildings; however, in low-rise SCBFs with braces in the 2-story X-configuration, column axial demands were up to 100% greater than those commonly used in design because of force redistribution that occurs after brace buckling. Column rotations in all frames were less than | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Seismic Column Demands in Ductile Braced Frames | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 135 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:1(33) | |
tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 135 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |