YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Damage Identification Based on Dead Load Redistribution: Effect of Measurement Error

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Xiaofeng Hu
    ,
    Harry W. Shenton III
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1264)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The effect of measurement error on the results of a new method for damage identification in large, massive civil structures is presented. The damage identification procedure is based on the redistribution of dead load in the structure that takes place when damage occurs. Damage is modeled in the flexural member by a section of reduced flexural rigidity. Static strain measurements are used as input to the procedure. The damage identification parameters are determined using a genetic algorithm. The effect of measurement error is investigated using Monte Carlo simulation. The measurement error is modeled as a Guassian, zero mean random variable. When the model element length is equal to the damage zone length, the results are in good agreement. The correct location and severity is determined even for significant levels of measurement error. The error-to-strain ratio is a convenient parameter for establishing when the error is too significant: results show that for error-to-strain ratios below about 40%, the procedure is able to determine the approximate location and severity of damage accurately. Damage is correctly identified, in an average sense, for the realistic case of when the model element length is not equal to the actual damage zone length. False-positive tests are conducted: the procedure is not prone to incorrectly identify damage when it does not exist, even in the presence of significant measurement error.
    • Download: (320.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Damage Identification Based on Dead Load Redistribution: Effect of Measurement Error

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/34858
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorXiaofeng Hu
    contributor authorHarry W. Shenton III
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:59:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:59:56Z
    date copyrightAugust 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282006%29132%3A8%281264%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34858
    description abstractThe effect of measurement error on the results of a new method for damage identification in large, massive civil structures is presented. The damage identification procedure is based on the redistribution of dead load in the structure that takes place when damage occurs. Damage is modeled in the flexural member by a section of reduced flexural rigidity. Static strain measurements are used as input to the procedure. The damage identification parameters are determined using a genetic algorithm. The effect of measurement error is investigated using Monte Carlo simulation. The measurement error is modeled as a Guassian, zero mean random variable. When the model element length is equal to the damage zone length, the results are in good agreement. The correct location and severity is determined even for significant levels of measurement error. The error-to-strain ratio is a convenient parameter for establishing when the error is too significant: results show that for error-to-strain ratios below about 40%, the procedure is able to determine the approximate location and severity of damage accurately. Damage is correctly identified, in an average sense, for the realistic case of when the model element length is not equal to the actual damage zone length. False-positive tests are conducted: the procedure is not prone to incorrectly identify damage when it does not exist, even in the presence of significant measurement error.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDamage Identification Based on Dead Load Redistribution: Effect of Measurement Error
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1264)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2006:;Volume ( 132 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian