YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rocking Wall–Frame Structures with Supplemental Tendon Systems

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Jack J. Ajrab
    ,
    Gokhan Pekcan
    ,
    John B. Mander
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(895)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper introduces the implementation of proposed rocking shear walls—as opposed to conventional fixed-based walls—in frame structures following the principles of the damage avoidance design philosophy. For improved seismic response, rocking walls are coupled with a separate nonload bearing nonlinear supplemental damping system. In view of the typical response of rocking systems, it is proposed that an energy dissipation system is configured and devices are strategically placed to exploit the expected large displacements. A performance-based design methodology is introduced and used to design a six-story rocking wall–frame building with various supplemental system configurations which include prestressed tendons and energy dissipation devices. Seismic performance and response evaluation, using nonlinear time–history analyses, suggests that desired performance levels (minor to no damage) can be achieved with added equivalent viscous damping (∼20%) resulting in reduced floor accelerations interstory drifts. Finally, a sensitivity study on the effect of various system parameters on the performance of the structure showed that the seismic response was not sensitive to the prestress level in tendons and to wall base width. Whereas a draped tendon profile results in a lower and more even distribution of interstory drifts in comparison to those in fixed-based structures.
    • Download: (185.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rocking Wall–Frame Structures with Supplemental Tendon Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/34319
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJack J. Ajrab
    contributor authorGokhan Pekcan
    contributor authorJohn B. Mander
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:59:05Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:59:05Z
    date copyrightJune 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282004%29130%3A6%28895%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34319
    description abstractThis paper introduces the implementation of proposed rocking shear walls—as opposed to conventional fixed-based walls—in frame structures following the principles of the damage avoidance design philosophy. For improved seismic response, rocking walls are coupled with a separate nonload bearing nonlinear supplemental damping system. In view of the typical response of rocking systems, it is proposed that an energy dissipation system is configured and devices are strategically placed to exploit the expected large displacements. A performance-based design methodology is introduced and used to design a six-story rocking wall–frame building with various supplemental system configurations which include prestressed tendons and energy dissipation devices. Seismic performance and response evaluation, using nonlinear time–history analyses, suggests that desired performance levels (minor to no damage) can be achieved with added equivalent viscous damping (∼20%) resulting in reduced floor accelerations interstory drifts. Finally, a sensitivity study on the effect of various system parameters on the performance of the structure showed that the seismic response was not sensitive to the prestress level in tendons and to wall base width. Whereas a draped tendon profile results in a lower and more even distribution of interstory drifts in comparison to those in fixed-based structures.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRocking Wall–Frame Structures with Supplemental Tendon Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(895)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian