YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Outrigger Beam–Wall Connections. I: Component Testing and Development of Design Model

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Bahram M. Shahrooz
    ,
    Jeremy T. Deason
    ,
    Gokhan Tunc
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(253)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: A key factor behind successful performance of outrigger beam–core wall connections in hybrid structures is the adequacy of headed studs that are typically used to connect a stud plate, onto which the outrigger beam is connected through a shear tab, to the wall. In an effort to better understand cyclic behavior of stud groups under combined action of gravity shear and cyclic diaphragm forces, the research reported was undertaken. Six 1/3-scale subassemblies that involve a portion of the wall, connection, and outrigger beam were fabricated and tested. The test results suggest that a design method which closely follows available equations for computing stud capacity results in connections that reach the design loads; however, the mode of failure is stud pullout. This mode of failure does not have any ductility and lacks energy dissipation capabilities. Moreover, the available design equations fail to capture the substantial increase in strength due to wall boundary element reinforcement around the studs. The boundary element also alters the mode of failure from stud pullout to stud fracture. A new design technique based on dissipating the input energy through yielding and eventual fracture of the shear tab was developed. The performance of a test specimen designed based on this methodology was found to be satisfactory in terms of strength, ductility, and energy dissipation characteristics. Two simple adjustments to available equations were also identified to account for the effects of confinement, by wall boundary element reinforcement, around headed studs.
    • Download: (1023.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Outrigger Beam–Wall Connections. I: Component Testing and Development of Design Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/34240
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBahram M. Shahrooz
    contributor authorJeremy T. Deason
    contributor authorGokhan Tunc
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:58:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:58:56Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282004%29130%3A2%28253%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34240
    description abstractA key factor behind successful performance of outrigger beam–core wall connections in hybrid structures is the adequacy of headed studs that are typically used to connect a stud plate, onto which the outrigger beam is connected through a shear tab, to the wall. In an effort to better understand cyclic behavior of stud groups under combined action of gravity shear and cyclic diaphragm forces, the research reported was undertaken. Six 1/3-scale subassemblies that involve a portion of the wall, connection, and outrigger beam were fabricated and tested. The test results suggest that a design method which closely follows available equations for computing stud capacity results in connections that reach the design loads; however, the mode of failure is stud pullout. This mode of failure does not have any ductility and lacks energy dissipation capabilities. Moreover, the available design equations fail to capture the substantial increase in strength due to wall boundary element reinforcement around the studs. The boundary element also alters the mode of failure from stud pullout to stud fracture. A new design technique based on dissipating the input energy through yielding and eventual fracture of the shear tab was developed. The performance of a test specimen designed based on this methodology was found to be satisfactory in terms of strength, ductility, and energy dissipation characteristics. Two simple adjustments to available equations were also identified to account for the effects of confinement, by wall boundary element reinforcement, around headed studs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOutrigger Beam–Wall Connections. I: Component Testing and Development of Design Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(253)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian