YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Load and Resistance Factor Design of Timber Joints: International Practice and Future Direction

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Ian Smith
    ,
    Greg Foliente
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(48)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: International practice for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of mechanical structural timber joints is reviewed. Attention is on design provisions in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Australia, those being locations where LRFD codes for wood construction exist. There are broad similarities between various codes, in that all countries adopt an element-based approach to design. Most codes base capacity design checks for joints with dowel-type fasteners on the so-called European yield model. There are a number of systematic differences in detailed implementation of LRFD concepts between countries. No country has yet used structural reliability concepts in derivation and/or calibration of design equations for joints as the level of safety cannot be formally assessed except for relatively simple problems. This contrasts with the situation for members, as several countries have already implemented reliability concepts in design of wood members. Thus, there is imbalance in the principles of design for members and joint in timber systems. Suggestions are made regarding actions necessary to place member and joint design on an equal footing.
    • Download: (209.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Load and Resistance Factor Design of Timber Joints: International Practice and Future Direction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/33704
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorIan Smith
    contributor authorGreg Foliente
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:58:09Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:58:09Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2002
    date issued2002
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282002%29128%3A1%2848%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/33704
    description abstractInternational practice for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of mechanical structural timber joints is reviewed. Attention is on design provisions in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Australia, those being locations where LRFD codes for wood construction exist. There are broad similarities between various codes, in that all countries adopt an element-based approach to design. Most codes base capacity design checks for joints with dowel-type fasteners on the so-called European yield model. There are a number of systematic differences in detailed implementation of LRFD concepts between countries. No country has yet used structural reliability concepts in derivation and/or calibration of design equations for joints as the level of safety cannot be formally assessed except for relatively simple problems. This contrasts with the situation for members, as several countries have already implemented reliability concepts in design of wood members. Thus, there is imbalance in the principles of design for members and joint in timber systems. Suggestions are made regarding actions necessary to place member and joint design on an equal footing.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLoad and Resistance Factor Design of Timber Joints: International Practice and Future Direction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume128
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(48)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian