YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pseudodynamic Testing of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    S. G. Buonopane
    ,
    R. N. White
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:6(578)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Seismic evaluation of a two-story, two-bay reinforced concrete frame infilled with masonry was performed by pseudodynamic testing of a half-scale specimen. The second-story infill included window openings. The specimen was subjected to four tests of increasing magnitude based on the Taft ground motion. Explicit numerical integration with a small time step, soft-coupled load system, and an iterative actuator control algorithm limited the displacement errors normally associated with pseudodynamic testing of stiff structures. The final sequence of tests produced diagonal cracking in the upper story, but primarily bed joint shear cracking in the lower story. Relations between the type of observed cracking and story drift-story shear response are explored. Compressive strut mechanisms are defined from the experimental values of moments and axial forces in the frame and infill panel strains. Estimates of story stiffness from several simple strut models were found to bound the experimentally measured values for both the first- and second-story walls prior to significant damage. Friction-based analytical estimates of panel shear strength were found to underestimate the measured strength and to be sensitive to the assumed coefficient of friction. Available methods for estimating shear strength that neglect infill-frame interaction were found to largely underestimate measured shear strength.
    • Download: (260.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pseudodynamic Testing of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/33194
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorS. G. Buonopane
    contributor authorR. N. White
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:57:25Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:57:25Z
    date copyrightJune 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281999%29125%3A6%28578%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/33194
    description abstractSeismic evaluation of a two-story, two-bay reinforced concrete frame infilled with masonry was performed by pseudodynamic testing of a half-scale specimen. The second-story infill included window openings. The specimen was subjected to four tests of increasing magnitude based on the Taft ground motion. Explicit numerical integration with a small time step, soft-coupled load system, and an iterative actuator control algorithm limited the displacement errors normally associated with pseudodynamic testing of stiff structures. The final sequence of tests produced diagonal cracking in the upper story, but primarily bed joint shear cracking in the lower story. Relations between the type of observed cracking and story drift-story shear response are explored. Compressive strut mechanisms are defined from the experimental values of moments and axial forces in the frame and infill panel strains. Estimates of story stiffness from several simple strut models were found to bound the experimentally measured values for both the first- and second-story walls prior to significant damage. Friction-based analytical estimates of panel shear strength were found to underestimate the measured strength and to be sensitive to the assumed coefficient of friction. Available methods for estimating shear strength that neglect infill-frame interaction were found to largely underestimate measured shear strength.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePseudodynamic Testing of Masonry Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume125
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:6(578)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian