Toward A Unified Nomenclature for Reinforced-Concrete TheorySource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 003Author:Thomas T. C. Hsu
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(275)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Research in the fundamental behavior of reinforced concrete has progressed greatly since the 1960s, particularly in the areas of shear and torsion. This large body of knowledge spawned many theories and created many terms that do not adhere to a centralized nomenclature—a very confusing situation for the engineering profession. This paper proposes a unified nomenclature that covers all four basic actions (bending, axial load, shear, and torsion) and is based on the angle of inclination of the concrete struts, the scope of applications, and the three fundamental principles of the mechanics of materials (stress equilibrium, strain compatibility, and the constitutive laws of materials). Six models are presented: strut-and-tie model, Bernoulli compatibility truss model, equilibrium (plasticity) truss model, Mohr compatibility truss model, softened truss model, and fixed-angle softened-truss model. This paper shows that all rational reinforced-concrete theories developed to date can be covered by these six models.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Thomas T. C. Hsu | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:56:13Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:56:13Z | |
| date copyright | March 1996 | |
| date issued | 1996 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%281996%29122%3A3%28275%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/32420 | |
| description abstract | Research in the fundamental behavior of reinforced concrete has progressed greatly since the 1960s, particularly in the areas of shear and torsion. This large body of knowledge spawned many theories and created many terms that do not adhere to a centralized nomenclature—a very confusing situation for the engineering profession. This paper proposes a unified nomenclature that covers all four basic actions (bending, axial load, shear, and torsion) and is based on the angle of inclination of the concrete struts, the scope of applications, and the three fundamental principles of the mechanics of materials (stress equilibrium, strain compatibility, and the constitutive laws of materials). Six models are presented: strut-and-tie model, Bernoulli compatibility truss model, equilibrium (plasticity) truss model, Mohr compatibility truss model, softened truss model, and fixed-angle softened-truss model. This paper shows that all rational reinforced-concrete theories developed to date can be covered by these six models. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Toward A Unified Nomenclature for Reinforced-Concrete Theory | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 122 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(275) | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |