Stiffness Formulation for Nonprismatic Beam ElementsSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 012Author:Arturo Tena-Colunga
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1484)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper presents a method to define two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) elastic-stiffness matrices for nonprismatic elements (tapered or haunched), based on traditional beam theory and the flexibility method. The proposed formulation includes deformations and the shape of the cross section but neglects warping deformations. Although more rigorous formulations for tapered elements have already been addressed, the proposed procedure is presented so its direct application or implementation in computer programs for structural analysis is straightforward. The procedure is compared against the design tables of the Portland Cement Association (PCA). It is demonstrated that the PCA tables are obsolete for today's state-of-the-knowledge on nonprismatic members because they can lead to significant errors. A new set of design aids for most common cross sections used in building structures have been developed to substitute the PCA handbook of frame constants. Closed-form solutions for linearly tapered elements of rectangular, square, and circular cross sections are provided. Finally, it is demonstrated that the stiffness factors for nonprismatic elements depend on the span-to-depth ratio of the element (
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Arturo Tena-Colunga | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:56:11Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:56:11Z | |
| date copyright | December 1996 | |
| date issued | 1996 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%281996%29122%3A12%281484%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/32389 | |
| description abstract | This paper presents a method to define two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) elastic-stiffness matrices for nonprismatic elements (tapered or haunched), based on traditional beam theory and the flexibility method. The proposed formulation includes deformations and the shape of the cross section but neglects warping deformations. Although more rigorous formulations for tapered elements have already been addressed, the proposed procedure is presented so its direct application or implementation in computer programs for structural analysis is straightforward. The procedure is compared against the design tables of the Portland Cement Association (PCA). It is demonstrated that the PCA tables are obsolete for today's state-of-the-knowledge on nonprismatic members because they can lead to significant errors. A new set of design aids for most common cross sections used in building structures have been developed to substitute the PCA handbook of frame constants. Closed-form solutions for linearly tapered elements of rectangular, square, and circular cross sections are provided. Finally, it is demonstrated that the stiffness factors for nonprismatic elements depend on the span-to-depth ratio of the element ( | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Stiffness Formulation for Nonprismatic Beam Elements | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 122 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1484) | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |