YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Why Direct Tension Test Specimens Break Flexing to the Side

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Zdeněk P. Bažant
    ,
    Luigi Cedolin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1101)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Contrary to the traditional view, unnotched direct tension test specimens of quasi‐brittle materials that exhibit post‐peak strain softening do not deform symmetrically. After passing the peak load, the equilibrium path bifurcates and the secondary postbifurcation branch represents flexing to the side. The bifurcation is shown to be analogous to Shanley's bifurcation in elastoplastic columns. According to the thermodynamic criterion of stable path, the flexing to one side must occur even if the geometry is perfect and if the straightening effect of the moment of the axial force about the centroid of the deflected cross section is taken into account. The lateral flexing favors failure of the specimen at midlength. The phenomenon (which is similar to the recently discovered behavior of notched tensile fracture specimens) is first illustrated using a simple model in which the specimen consists of two rigid bars of unequal lengths, joined by a strain‐softening link. It is shown that flexing to the side is retarded if the attachments to the loading machine exert a sufficient restraint against rotation. The analysis is then extended to a specimen consisting of two unloading elastic beams joined by a short strain‐softening segment, and similar conclusions are reached. The maximum load in the unnotched direct‐tension test gives the material strength limit, but the postpeak load‐deflection response cannot yield the strain‐softening material properties and energy‐absorption capability except when sophisticated stability analysis is made and the size of the strain‐softening zone is known a priori.
    • Download: (644.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Why Direct Tension Test Specimens Break Flexing to the Side

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/31672
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZdeněk P. Bažant
    contributor authorLuigi Cedolin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:55:03Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:55:03Z
    date copyrightApril 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281993%29119%3A4%281101%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/31672
    description abstractContrary to the traditional view, unnotched direct tension test specimens of quasi‐brittle materials that exhibit post‐peak strain softening do not deform symmetrically. After passing the peak load, the equilibrium path bifurcates and the secondary postbifurcation branch represents flexing to the side. The bifurcation is shown to be analogous to Shanley's bifurcation in elastoplastic columns. According to the thermodynamic criterion of stable path, the flexing to one side must occur even if the geometry is perfect and if the straightening effect of the moment of the axial force about the centroid of the deflected cross section is taken into account. The lateral flexing favors failure of the specimen at midlength. The phenomenon (which is similar to the recently discovered behavior of notched tensile fracture specimens) is first illustrated using a simple model in which the specimen consists of two rigid bars of unequal lengths, joined by a strain‐softening link. It is shown that flexing to the side is retarded if the attachments to the loading machine exert a sufficient restraint against rotation. The analysis is then extended to a specimen consisting of two unloading elastic beams joined by a short strain‐softening segment, and similar conclusions are reached. The maximum load in the unnotched direct‐tension test gives the material strength limit, but the postpeak load‐deflection response cannot yield the strain‐softening material properties and energy‐absorption capability except when sophisticated stability analysis is made and the size of the strain‐softening zone is known a priori.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleWhy Direct Tension Test Specimens Break Flexing to the Side
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1101)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian