YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Bahram M. Shahrooz
    ,
    Mark E. Remmetter
    ,
    Fei Qin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3291)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The cyclic response of steel coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete boundary elements was studied. Three half‐scale subassemblies representing a portion of a prototype structure were designed, constructed, and tested. The main test variables were the amount of vertical tension/compression stresses in the boundary element, and presence of auxiliary bars attached to the beam flanges for a smoother transfer of bearing stresses. The steel coupling beams exhibited very stable hysteresis characteristics, and could develop the theoretical plastic moment when the boundary and, hence, the connection region were subjected to normal compressive stresses. Tensile stresses in the boundary element reduced the stiffness, and smaller moments could be developed. A significant amount of dissipated energy could be accounted by that energy dissipated in “plastic hinges” formed in the exposed portion of the coupling beam. The stiffness was found to be different depending on whether the boundary element was under compressive or tensile normal stresses. The initial stiffness of the coupling beams in all the specimens was smaller than the value computed assuming full fixity at the face of the wall. The “effective fixed point” of the coupling beam was found to be inside the wall at approximately one‐third of the embedment length from the face of the wall. Analysis and design of composite coupled walls should account for the actual location at which the coupling beams are fixed in the walls.
    • Download: (1.448Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Seismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/31581
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBahram M. Shahrooz
    contributor authorMark E. Remmetter
    contributor authorFei Qin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:54:55Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:54:55Z
    date copyrightNovember 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281993%29119%3A11%283291%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/31581
    description abstractThe cyclic response of steel coupling beams embedded into reinforced concrete boundary elements was studied. Three half‐scale subassemblies representing a portion of a prototype structure were designed, constructed, and tested. The main test variables were the amount of vertical tension/compression stresses in the boundary element, and presence of auxiliary bars attached to the beam flanges for a smoother transfer of bearing stresses. The steel coupling beams exhibited very stable hysteresis characteristics, and could develop the theoretical plastic moment when the boundary and, hence, the connection region were subjected to normal compressive stresses. Tensile stresses in the boundary element reduced the stiffness, and smaller moments could be developed. A significant amount of dissipated energy could be accounted by that energy dissipated in “plastic hinges” formed in the exposed portion of the coupling beam. The stiffness was found to be different depending on whether the boundary element was under compressive or tensile normal stresses. The initial stiffness of the coupling beams in all the specimens was smaller than the value computed assuming full fixity at the face of the wall. The “effective fixed point” of the coupling beam was found to be inside the wall at approximately one‐third of the embedment length from the face of the wall. Analysis and design of composite coupled walls should account for the actual location at which the coupling beams are fixed in the walls.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSeismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3291)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian