Show simple item record

contributor authorEdmund C. C. Choi
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:53:34Z
date available2017-05-08T20:53:34Z
date copyrightNovember 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281990%29116%3A11%283162%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/30744
description abstractThe present paper presents results of a live‐load survey in office buildings. A live‐load model for the calculation of lifetime maximum total load is calibrated by using the Sydney survey data. Loading characteristics for government and nongovernment occupancies are compared. Sustained load for government occupancy is observed to be greater. However, as the frequency of occupancy change is much higher for nongovernment occupancies, their lifetime maximum sustained load for small areas becomes larger. For large and medium areas, government occupancy still has higher loading. Three types of extraordinary load are identified. Parameters for all three types of government occupancy have higher values than nongovernment ones. The maximum mean extraordinary load and also the lifetime maximum total load are substantially larger for government occupancy. The 95% fractile lifetime total load predicted by the model is compared with the Standard Association of Australia (SAA) loading code, American Building Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) building code, and the U.K. loading code.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLive Load for Office Buildings: Effect of Occupancy and Code Comparison
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3162)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record