Live Load for Office Buildings: Effect of Occupancy and Code ComparisonSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 011Author:Edmund C. C. Choi
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3162)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The present paper presents results of a live‐load survey in office buildings. A live‐load model for the calculation of lifetime maximum total load is calibrated by using the Sydney survey data. Loading characteristics for government and nongovernment occupancies are compared. Sustained load for government occupancy is observed to be greater. However, as the frequency of occupancy change is much higher for nongovernment occupancies, their lifetime maximum sustained load for small areas becomes larger. For large and medium areas, government occupancy still has higher loading. Three types of extraordinary load are identified. Parameters for all three types of government occupancy have higher values than nongovernment ones. The maximum mean extraordinary load and also the lifetime maximum total load are substantially larger for government occupancy. The 95% fractile lifetime total load predicted by the model is compared with the Standard Association of Australia (SAA) loading code, American Building Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) building code, and the U.K. loading code.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Edmund C. C. Choi | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:53:34Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:53:34Z | |
| date copyright | November 1990 | |
| date issued | 1990 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%281990%29116%3A11%283162%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/30744 | |
| description abstract | The present paper presents results of a live‐load survey in office buildings. A live‐load model for the calculation of lifetime maximum total load is calibrated by using the Sydney survey data. Loading characteristics for government and nongovernment occupancies are compared. Sustained load for government occupancy is observed to be greater. However, as the frequency of occupancy change is much higher for nongovernment occupancies, their lifetime maximum sustained load for small areas becomes larger. For large and medium areas, government occupancy still has higher loading. Three types of extraordinary load are identified. Parameters for all three types of government occupancy have higher values than nongovernment ones. The maximum mean extraordinary load and also the lifetime maximum total load are substantially larger for government occupancy. The 95% fractile lifetime total load predicted by the model is compared with the Standard Association of Australia (SAA) loading code, American Building Officials and Code Administrators (BOCA) building code, and the U.K. loading code. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Live Load for Office Buildings: Effect of Occupancy and Code Comparison | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 116 | |
| journal issue | 11 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3162) | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 011 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |