YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Disinfection with Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide

    Source: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    E. Marco Aieta
    ,
    Paul V. Roberts
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1983)109:4(783)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Disinfection with chlorine dioxide was compared to disinfection with chlorine in wastewater from three treatment sequences: (1) Conventional activated‐sludge treatment; (2) activated‐sludge/nitrification; and (3) activated‐sludge/nitrification/filtration treatment. The comparisons were made based on correlations of fractional survival of coliform bacteria with the product of residual concentration times contact time for each disinfectant. Laboratory experiments were conducted in a complete randomized block design, with mass dose of disinfectant (3 levels) and contact time (3 levels) as independent variables. The laboratory experiments were conducted in a four‐liter batch reactor. In general, both chlorine and chlorine dioxide give decreased survival ratios for increases in dose or contact time. In all cases, chlorine dioxide achieved a given fractional kill with an equal or lower residual time product than chlorine. Chlorine dioxide demand is greater in conventional secondary effluent than the chlorine demand, but less than that for chlorine in nitrified effluents. The chloramines found in non‐nitrified wastewaters are much less effective in disinfection than “free” chlorine. The disinfection effectiveness of chlorine dioxide, and to a lesser extent that of chlorine, is enhanced by the filtration process in both conventional secondary effluent and in nitrified effluent.
    • Download: (993.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Disinfection with Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/30276
    Collections
    • Journal of Environmental Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorE. Marco Aieta
    contributor authorPaul V. Roberts
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:52:51Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:52:51Z
    date copyrightAugust 1983
    date issued1983
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%281983%29109%3A4%28783%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/30276
    description abstractDisinfection with chlorine dioxide was compared to disinfection with chlorine in wastewater from three treatment sequences: (1) Conventional activated‐sludge treatment; (2) activated‐sludge/nitrification; and (3) activated‐sludge/nitrification/filtration treatment. The comparisons were made based on correlations of fractional survival of coliform bacteria with the product of residual concentration times contact time for each disinfectant. Laboratory experiments were conducted in a complete randomized block design, with mass dose of disinfectant (3 levels) and contact time (3 levels) as independent variables. The laboratory experiments were conducted in a four‐liter batch reactor. In general, both chlorine and chlorine dioxide give decreased survival ratios for increases in dose or contact time. In all cases, chlorine dioxide achieved a given fractional kill with an equal or lower residual time product than chlorine. Chlorine dioxide demand is greater in conventional secondary effluent than the chlorine demand, but less than that for chlorine in nitrified effluents. The chloramines found in non‐nitrified wastewaters are much less effective in disinfection than “free” chlorine. The disinfection effectiveness of chlorine dioxide, and to a lesser extent that of chlorine, is enhanced by the filtration process in both conventional secondary effluent and in nitrified effluent.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDisinfection with Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume109
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1983)109:4(783)
    treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian