YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Autostress Design of Steel Bridges

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Geerhard Haaijer
    ,
    Phillip S. Carskaddan
    ,
    Michael A. Grubb
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(188)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Current methods of steel‐bridge design, including the AASHTO Load Factor Design method, are based on elastic analyses with only limited implicit recognition of the ability of such members to adjust for. the effects of yielding. The Autostress method, which is an extension of the Load Factor method, explicitly considers these effects at Overload and Maximum Load. At Overload, autostresses and automoments caused by local plastic deformations assure elastic behavior; i.e., shakedown, after initial passages of heavy permit loads. Limit‐state criteria for riding quality and concrete cracking are considered. At Maximum Load, the strength of continuous bridge members is determined with a new plastic‐design method for noncompact members. The new design criteria can be used for the design of new bridges and for the rating of existing bridges.
    • Download: (716.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Autostress Design of Steel Bridges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/28799
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGeerhard Haaijer
    contributor authorPhillip S. Carskaddan
    contributor authorMichael A. Grubb
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:50:19Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:50:19Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1983
    date issued1983
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%281983%29109%3A1%28188%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28799
    description abstractCurrent methods of steel‐bridge design, including the AASHTO Load Factor Design method, are based on elastic analyses with only limited implicit recognition of the ability of such members to adjust for. the effects of yielding. The Autostress method, which is an extension of the Load Factor method, explicitly considers these effects at Overload and Maximum Load. At Overload, autostresses and automoments caused by local plastic deformations assure elastic behavior; i.e., shakedown, after initial passages of heavy permit loads. Limit‐state criteria for riding quality and concrete cracking are considered. At Maximum Load, the strength of continuous bridge members is determined with a new plastic‐design method for noncompact members. The new design criteria can be used for the design of new bridges and for the rating of existing bridges.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAutostress Design of Steel Bridges
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume109
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:1(188)
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian