YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance of Model Predictive Control on ASCE Test Canal 1

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Brian T. Wahlin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:3(227)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Model predictive control (MPC) is a popular control algorithm in the process control industry that is particularly suited to the automatic control of irrigation water delivery systems because it explicitly accounts for the long delay times encountered in open-channel flow. In addition, a feedforward routine is easy to implement in MPC and many of the constraints that canal operators face can be directly incorporated into the MPC scheme. The ASCE Task Committee on Canal Automation Algorithms developed a series of test cases to evaluate the performance of canal control algorithms. In this paper, simulation tests were performed on ASCE test canal 1 using a remote downstream control configuration of MPC. The MPC algorithm effectively controls ASCE test canal 1, and its performance was similar to that of other proposed controllers. When there were no minimum gate movement constraints, MPC was fairly robust because the controller performance did not significantly degrade under untuned conditions. In the presence of minimum gate movement constraints, the water levels continually oscillate around the water level setpoint. Using the configuration presented in this paper, the feedforward portion of MPC does not perform as well as other proposed feedforward routines. This underperformance is related to the simplifications made by the underlying process model and not to MPC itself.
    • Download: (176.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance of Model Predictive Control on ASCE Test Canal 1

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/28257
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrian T. Wahlin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:49:26Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:49:26Z
    date copyrightJune 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%282004%29130%3A3%28227%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28257
    description abstractModel predictive control (MPC) is a popular control algorithm in the process control industry that is particularly suited to the automatic control of irrigation water delivery systems because it explicitly accounts for the long delay times encountered in open-channel flow. In addition, a feedforward routine is easy to implement in MPC and many of the constraints that canal operators face can be directly incorporated into the MPC scheme. The ASCE Task Committee on Canal Automation Algorithms developed a series of test cases to evaluate the performance of canal control algorithms. In this paper, simulation tests were performed on ASCE test canal 1 using a remote downstream control configuration of MPC. The MPC algorithm effectively controls ASCE test canal 1, and its performance was similar to that of other proposed controllers. When there were no minimum gate movement constraints, MPC was fairly robust because the controller performance did not significantly degrade under untuned conditions. In the presence of minimum gate movement constraints, the water levels continually oscillate around the water level setpoint. Using the configuration presented in this paper, the feedforward portion of MPC does not perform as well as other proposed feedforward routines. This underperformance is related to the simplifications made by the underlying process model and not to MPC itself.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePerformance of Model Predictive Control on ASCE Test Canal 1
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:3(227)
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian