Comparison of Reference Evapotranspiration Calculations as Part of the ASCE Standardization Effort

Abstract

Comparison among commonly used reference evapotranspiration (ET) equations in the United States and the recently recommended ASCE standardized reference ET equation was made as part of the ASCE standardization effort. Analyses used hourly and daily weather data from 49 geographically diverse sites in the United States. Calculations were performed for both grass and alfalfa reference crops in a consistent manner, using weather data that passed integrity and quality assessment checks. Comparisons were made between reference ET computed by the various methods and the ASCE Penman-Monteith (PM) equation used for a daily calculation time step. In addition, calculations using hourly time steps and summed daily were compared with daily calculations for the same method as well as against the ASCE-PM method. Results showed that the ASCE standardized equation agreed best with the full form of ASCE-PM. The results provide a basis for objectively assessing the relative performance of reference ET equations in a variety of climates and support adoption of a standardized equation as recommended by the ASCE Task Committee.