YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Surface Storage in Furrow Irrigation Evaluation

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    D. Renault
    ,
    W. W. Wallender
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:6(415)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Assessment of the surface storage is of great importance in hydrological surface irrigation. For the Horton infiltration law used in the ALIVE model (Advanced LInear VElocity), an accurate measurement of surface storage is the key to successfully predicting infiltration. For the Kostiakov function, the conclusion is paradoxical due to the fact that this law systematically underpredicts infiltration for times greater than the time used for fitting. Measuring surface storage accurately is cumbersome, and, consequently, most of the models use empirical formulas, which are reasonable, if not always precise. The constant mean cross-section assumption that is implied in hydrological models is discussed from a practical point of view. A representation of nonuniform storage distribution is presented through the ALIVE approach, and the feasibility of an inverse solution is discussed. Finally, field records and numerical tests indicate that if the variation of the cross-section remains low (less than half or double the mean) and is randomly distributed the constant mean cross-section assumption is acceptable. With large variations in the flow cross section, the error is lumped with variation in infiltration characteristics. Low variations that are not randomly distributed can affect the infiltration evaluation process. Models using the Kostiakov function are much more sensitive to this phenomenon than the ALIVE model, which uses the Horton law. The reason is likely that the ALIVE model is based on the analysis of the advance rate as a function of distance
    • Download: (1020.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Surface Storage in Furrow Irrigation Evaluation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/27829
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorD. Renault
    contributor authorW. W. Wallender
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:48:48Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:48:48Z
    date copyrightNovember 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9437%281997%29123%3A6%28415%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27829
    description abstractAssessment of the surface storage is of great importance in hydrological surface irrigation. For the Horton infiltration law used in the ALIVE model (Advanced LInear VElocity), an accurate measurement of surface storage is the key to successfully predicting infiltration. For the Kostiakov function, the conclusion is paradoxical due to the fact that this law systematically underpredicts infiltration for times greater than the time used for fitting. Measuring surface storage accurately is cumbersome, and, consequently, most of the models use empirical formulas, which are reasonable, if not always precise. The constant mean cross-section assumption that is implied in hydrological models is discussed from a practical point of view. A representation of nonuniform storage distribution is presented through the ALIVE approach, and the feasibility of an inverse solution is discussed. Finally, field records and numerical tests indicate that if the variation of the cross-section remains low (less than half or double the mean) and is randomly distributed the constant mean cross-section assumption is acceptable. With large variations in the flow cross section, the error is lumped with variation in infiltration characteristics. Low variations that are not randomly distributed can affect the infiltration evaluation process. Models using the Kostiakov function are much more sensitive to this phenomenon than the ALIVE model, which uses the Horton law. The reason is likely that the ALIVE model is based on the analysis of the advance rate as a function of distance
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSurface Storage in Furrow Irrigation Evaluation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:6(415)
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian