| contributor author | Zubair Ahmed | |
| contributor author | T. D. White | |
| contributor author | T. Kuczek | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:48:45Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:48:45Z | |
| date copyright | May 1997 | |
| date issued | 1997 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9437%281997%29123%3A3%28194%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27794 | |
| description abstract | Long-term pavement performance in wet climates is directly related to the amount, extent, and duration of internal moisture. Retention of moisture in base/subbase layers can lead to damage and premature failure of the pavement structure. A positive subdrainage system can mitigate moisture retention. Two types of subdrainage collector systems are commonly used for removing subsurface moisture from pavement systems. These are the conventional perforated pipe edge drains and the prefabricated edge drains (PFEDs) or geotextile fin drains. Significant research was conducted in Indiana on in-place asphalt, concrete, and overlaid pavement sections incorporating these two types of subdrainage systems. Data collected from instrumented sites show varying response rates and time of outflow with respect to precipitation for pavement and collector types. Pavement-shoulder joints were found to be the major source of surface infiltration. Statistical analysis has shown significant influence of base permeability in addition to pavement and drain types on outflow volumes. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Comparative Field Performance of Subdrainage Systems | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 123 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:3(194) | |
| tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |