| contributor author | G. P. Merkley | |
| contributor author | W. R. Walker | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:47:23Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:47:23Z | |
| date copyright | May 1991 | |
| date issued | 1991 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9437%281991%29117%3A3%28377%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/27230 | |
| description abstract | Many schemes and devices have been developed and tested during the past three decades for automatic control of canal networks. Most of these have used local flow criteria to determine gate settings. Computer simulation of transient canal hydraulics has also been used to help test some of the ideas for canal automation, and in some cases the simulations have been applied directly to canal operation. In this paper, a centralized gate‐scheduling logic for a transient hydraulic model is presented, and a sample comparison between the centralized logic, and one form of a local‐gate‐scheduling scheme, is given. The centralized approach to canal operation is shown to be significantly more stable than the local approach, with minimal fluctuations in target flow levels. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Centralized Scheduling Logic for Canal Operation | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 117 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1991)117:3(377) | |
| tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |