YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk Analysis for Dam Overtopping—Feitsui Reservoir as a Case Study

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Jan-Tai Kuo
    ,
    Ben-Chie Yen
    ,
    Yung-Chia Hsu
    ,
    Huei-Fen Lin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:8(955)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Risk and uncertainty analysis by mathematical and statistical methods is often used to assess systematic risks and uncertainties. This research presents the procedure and application of risk and reliability analysis to dam overtopping. Annual maximum series of peak discharges of Feitsui Reservoir in northern Taiwan are used to analyze five extreme flood events with different frequencies. The highest water levels of the five extreme flood events were computed by using reservoir routing and considering seven factors subject to uncertainty. Afterward, the overtopping risk of Feitsui Dam was assessed by five uncertainty analysis methods: Rosenblueth’s point estimation method (RPEM), Harr’s point estimation method (HPEM), Monte Carlo simulation, Latin hypercube sampling, and the mean-value first-order second-moment (MFOSM) method. The results show that values of overtopping risk computed by different methods are similar. One may apply some approximated methods (MFOSM, HPEM and RPEM) to avoid the computational burden by applying sampling methods. Furthermore, the accuracy of results by approximated methods compared with that by sampling methods may differ from case to case. The selection and application of the uncertainty methods depend upon the information availability of the model parameters and model complexity. One may need to examine the model parameters and model complexity before determining appropriate methods to be used in a study.
    • Download: (561.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Risk Analysis for Dam Overtopping—Feitsui Reservoir as a Case Study

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/26341
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJan-Tai Kuo
    contributor authorBen-Chie Yen
    contributor authorYung-Chia Hsu
    contributor authorHuei-Fen Lin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:45:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:45:52Z
    date copyrightAugust 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%282007%29133%3A8%28955%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26341
    description abstractRisk and uncertainty analysis by mathematical and statistical methods is often used to assess systematic risks and uncertainties. This research presents the procedure and application of risk and reliability analysis to dam overtopping. Annual maximum series of peak discharges of Feitsui Reservoir in northern Taiwan are used to analyze five extreme flood events with different frequencies. The highest water levels of the five extreme flood events were computed by using reservoir routing and considering seven factors subject to uncertainty. Afterward, the overtopping risk of Feitsui Dam was assessed by five uncertainty analysis methods: Rosenblueth’s point estimation method (RPEM), Harr’s point estimation method (HPEM), Monte Carlo simulation, Latin hypercube sampling, and the mean-value first-order second-moment (MFOSM) method. The results show that values of overtopping risk computed by different methods are similar. One may apply some approximated methods (MFOSM, HPEM and RPEM) to avoid the computational burden by applying sampling methods. Furthermore, the accuracy of results by approximated methods compared with that by sampling methods may differ from case to case. The selection and application of the uncertainty methods depend upon the information availability of the model parameters and model complexity. One may need to examine the model parameters and model complexity before determining appropriate methods to be used in a study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRisk Analysis for Dam Overtopping—Feitsui Reservoir as a Case Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:8(955)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian