YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Calibration of Water Distribution Hydraulic Models Using a Bayesian-Type Procedure

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Zoran S. Kapelan
    ,
    Dragan A. Savic
    ,
    Godfrey A. Walters
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:8(927)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Estimating model parameters is a difficult, yet critical step in the use of water distribution system models. Most of the optimization-based approaches developed so far concentrate primarily on efficient and effective ways of obtaining optimal calibration parameter values. At the same time, very little effort has been made to determine the uncertainties (i.e., errors) associated with those values (and related model predictions). So far, this has typically been done using the first-order second moment (FOSM) method. Even though reasonably computationally efficient, the FOSM approach relies on several restrictive assumptions and requires computationally demanding calculation of derivatives. To overcome these limitations, the recently developed shuffled complex evolution metropolis (SCEM-UA) global optimization algorithm is linked to the Epanet2 hydraulic model and used to solve a least-squares-type calibration problem. The methodology is tested and verified on the Anytown literature case study. The main advantage of the SCEM-UA algorithm over existing approaches is that both calibration parameter values and associated uncertainties can be determined in a single optimization model run. In addition, no model linearity or parameter normality assumptions have to be made nor any derivatives calculated. The main drawback of the SCEM-UA methodology is that it could, potentially, be computationally demanding, although this is not envisaged as a major problem with current computers.
    • Download: (949.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Calibration of Water Distribution Hydraulic Models Using a Bayesian-Type Procedure

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/26338
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZoran S. Kapelan
    contributor authorDragan A. Savic
    contributor authorGodfrey A. Walters
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:45:52Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:45:52Z
    date copyrightAugust 2007
    date issued2007
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%282007%29133%3A8%28927%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/26338
    description abstractEstimating model parameters is a difficult, yet critical step in the use of water distribution system models. Most of the optimization-based approaches developed so far concentrate primarily on efficient and effective ways of obtaining optimal calibration parameter values. At the same time, very little effort has been made to determine the uncertainties (i.e., errors) associated with those values (and related model predictions). So far, this has typically been done using the first-order second moment (FOSM) method. Even though reasonably computationally efficient, the FOSM approach relies on several restrictive assumptions and requires computationally demanding calculation of derivatives. To overcome these limitations, the recently developed shuffled complex evolution metropolis (SCEM-UA) global optimization algorithm is linked to the Epanet2 hydraulic model and used to solve a least-squares-type calibration problem. The methodology is tested and verified on the Anytown literature case study. The main advantage of the SCEM-UA algorithm over existing approaches is that both calibration parameter values and associated uncertainties can be determined in a single optimization model run. In addition, no model linearity or parameter normality assumptions have to be made nor any derivatives calculated. The main drawback of the SCEM-UA methodology is that it could, potentially, be computationally demanding, although this is not envisaged as a major problem with current computers.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCalibration of Water Distribution Hydraulic Models Using a Bayesian-Type Procedure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:8(927)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 133 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian