Comparison of Two Techniques to Measure Sediment Erodibility in the Fox River, Wisconsin

Abstract

This paper compares the results of two sediment erodibility test methods that have been applied on surficial sediments at a number of locations on the Fox River in Wisconsin. The methods include a straight flume that is deployed in situ (the FLUME) and a straight laboratory flume (the SEDFLUME). The sediment erosion rates measured near the surface (in the top four centimeters) as a function of bottom stress were compared. On average, the erodibility measured by the SEDFLUME was about 5.5 times greater than that measured by the FLUME. A possible reason for the difference is the relatively short test section of the SEDFLUME.