YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experiments on Reworking by Successive Unconfined Subaqueous and Subaerial Muddy Debris Flows

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Horacio Toniolo
    ,
    Peter Harff
    ,
    Jeff Marr
    ,
    Chris Paola
    ,
    Gary Parker
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:1(38)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Debris flows occur under water, e.g., in lakes and the ocean, as well as under air. These two types of debris flow have many similarities, but also differ in striking ways. The focus of the research reported here is on the ability of an unconfined debris flow to remobilize or rework an antecedent deposit over which it runs. Experiments were performed in a tank in order to quantify reworking. The debris slurry was premixed and consisted of a mixture of water, sand, and kaolinite clay. Three experiments were performed, each consisting of four individual runs. In each run the slurry was released impulsively from a head tank. The first run of each experiment formed a deposit over the initial inerodible bed. The second, third, and fourth runs progressed over and reworked to a greater or lesser extent the antecedent deposit(s). Two experiments of four runs each were performed in the subaqueous configuration, and one experiment of four runs was performed in the subaerial configuration. In the subaerial case, reworking was immediate and extensive. In the subaqueous case, reworking of the deposit of the first run by the second run was suppressed. Part of the reason for this appears to be hydroplaning of the head of the debris flow. As the deposit built up, however, considerable reworking was eventually observed in the subaqueous case as well.
    • Download: (1.137Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experiments on Reworking by Successive Unconfined Subaqueous and Subaerial Muddy Debris Flows

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/25621
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHoracio Toniolo
    contributor authorPeter Harff
    contributor authorJeff Marr
    contributor authorChris Paola
    contributor authorGary Parker
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:44:39Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:44:39Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%282004%29130%3A1%2838%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/25621
    description abstractDebris flows occur under water, e.g., in lakes and the ocean, as well as under air. These two types of debris flow have many similarities, but also differ in striking ways. The focus of the research reported here is on the ability of an unconfined debris flow to remobilize or rework an antecedent deposit over which it runs. Experiments were performed in a tank in order to quantify reworking. The debris slurry was premixed and consisted of a mixture of water, sand, and kaolinite clay. Three experiments were performed, each consisting of four individual runs. In each run the slurry was released impulsively from a head tank. The first run of each experiment formed a deposit over the initial inerodible bed. The second, third, and fourth runs progressed over and reworked to a greater or lesser extent the antecedent deposit(s). Two experiments of four runs each were performed in the subaqueous configuration, and one experiment of four runs was performed in the subaerial configuration. In the subaerial case, reworking was immediate and extensive. In the subaqueous case, reworking of the deposit of the first run by the second run was suppressed. Part of the reason for this appears to be hydroplaning of the head of the debris flow. As the deposit built up, however, considerable reworking was eventually observed in the subaqueous case as well.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleExperiments on Reworking by Successive Unconfined Subaqueous and Subaerial Muddy Debris Flows
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:1(38)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian