| contributor author | Ronald Smith | |
| contributor author | Yongming Tang | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:44:32Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:44:32Z | |
| date copyright | May 2003 | |
| date issued | 2003 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9429%282003%29129%3A5%28408%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/25554 | |
| description abstract | Gross, Koseff, and Monismith used two advection test cases to expose the poor performance of seven widely used explicit numerical schemes. Here, those test cases are used to reveal the weakness and strength of the optimal compact implicit scheme. In the diagonal advection of a sharp square block, there are sawtooth grid scale errors. Binomial smoothing, with standard deviation of one grid spacing of the initial square block is required before the optimal compact implicit scheme improves upon the best of the explicit schemes. For the circular advection of a smooth narrow Gaussian cone, the accuracy is | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Advection Tests of Optimal Compact Implicit Scheme | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 129 | |
| journal issue | 5 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:5(408) | |
| tree | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 005 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |