YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Benchmarking of Construction Productivity

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Hee-Sung Park
    ,
    Stephen R. Thomas
    ,
    Richard L. Tucker
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(772)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Construction productivity has been a cause of great concern in both the construction industry and academia. Even though many companies have developed their own productivity tracking systems based on their experiences and accounting systems, none have been successful in establishing common definitions and developing a survey tool that collects standard productivity data at the appropriate levels. This research was initiated to establish a common set of construction productivity metrics and their corresponding definitions. As a result of this research effort, the Construction Productivity Metrics System (CPMS), which contain a list of direct and indirect accounts and 56 data elements grouped into seven major categories, was developed. The Construction Productivity Metrics System is a standard construction productivity data collection tool and provides a framework to report industry norms to benchmark construction productivity. Input from 73 industry experts was used in determining the 56 measuring elements and their corresponding definitions. Preliminary findings from initial sample of 16 industrial projects indicate that the productivity metrics can be produced and should be meaningful for construction productivity benchmarking. Because of the small sample size, more than general preliminary conclusion would be inappropriate. Based on the analyses, the developed CPMS is believed to be a reasonable productivity data collection tool and when sufficient data are available should be capable of producing reasonable industry benchmarks.
    • Download: (69.54Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Benchmarking of Construction Productivity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/24253
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHee-Sung Park
    contributor authorStephen R. Thomas
    contributor authorRichard L. Tucker
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:42:31Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:42:31Z
    date copyrightJuly 2005
    date issued2005
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282005%29131%3A7%28772%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/24253
    description abstractConstruction productivity has been a cause of great concern in both the construction industry and academia. Even though many companies have developed their own productivity tracking systems based on their experiences and accounting systems, none have been successful in establishing common definitions and developing a survey tool that collects standard productivity data at the appropriate levels. This research was initiated to establish a common set of construction productivity metrics and their corresponding definitions. As a result of this research effort, the Construction Productivity Metrics System (CPMS), which contain a list of direct and indirect accounts and 56 data elements grouped into seven major categories, was developed. The Construction Productivity Metrics System is a standard construction productivity data collection tool and provides a framework to report industry norms to benchmark construction productivity. Input from 73 industry experts was used in determining the 56 measuring elements and their corresponding definitions. Preliminary findings from initial sample of 16 industrial projects indicate that the productivity metrics can be produced and should be meaningful for construction productivity benchmarking. Because of the small sample size, more than general preliminary conclusion would be inappropriate. Based on the analyses, the developed CPMS is believed to be a reasonable productivity data collection tool and when sufficient data are available should be capable of producing reasonable industry benchmarks.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBenchmarking of Construction Productivity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:7(772)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian