YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sediment Feed and Recirculating Flumes: Fundamental Difference

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Gary Parker
    ,
    Peter R. Wilcock
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1192)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Two standard modes of laboratory sediment transport flume operation are sediment‐feed and recirculating. In the case of uniform sediment, the final equilibriums achieved in the two modes are equivalent and independent of initial conditions, even though the specified flow and sediment constraints differ. When the sediment consists of a mixture of sizes, however, this symmetry breaks down. In a sediment‐feed flume, both the feed rate and size distribution are specified by the user, and must be identical to those of the bed load at final equilibrium. The final state thus becomes independent of initial conditions. In a recirculating flume, however, the equilibrium size distribution of neither the bed load nor the bed surface material can be specified in advance. As a result, the final state depends on the initial conditions and can include the possibility of partial transport. The equilibriums themselves are equivalent in that they obey the same laws of flow and sediment transport. Their a‐priori predictability, however, differs due to the difference in governing constraints. When fractional transport is scaled by the bulk size distribution, the two flume modes may produce very different transport relations, even for the same sediment. A consistent approach requires that the transport be scaled by the size distribution of the bed surface.
    • Download: (761.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sediment Feed and Recirculating Flumes: Fundamental Difference

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/23749
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGary Parker
    contributor authorPeter R. Wilcock
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:41:40Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:41:40Z
    date copyrightNovember 1993
    date issued1993
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281993%29119%3A11%281192%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23749
    description abstractTwo standard modes of laboratory sediment transport flume operation are sediment‐feed and recirculating. In the case of uniform sediment, the final equilibriums achieved in the two modes are equivalent and independent of initial conditions, even though the specified flow and sediment constraints differ. When the sediment consists of a mixture of sizes, however, this symmetry breaks down. In a sediment‐feed flume, both the feed rate and size distribution are specified by the user, and must be identical to those of the bed load at final equilibrium. The final state thus becomes independent of initial conditions. In a recirculating flume, however, the equilibrium size distribution of neither the bed load nor the bed surface material can be specified in advance. As a result, the final state depends on the initial conditions and can include the possibility of partial transport. The equilibriums themselves are equivalent in that they obey the same laws of flow and sediment transport. Their a‐priori predictability, however, differs due to the difference in governing constraints. When fractional transport is scaled by the bulk size distribution, the two flume modes may produce very different transport relations, even for the same sediment. A consistent approach requires that the transport be scaled by the size distribution of the bed surface.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSediment Feed and Recirculating Flumes: Fundamental Difference
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1192)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1993:;Volume ( 119 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian