YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Relational Selection for Collaborative Working Arrangements

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    M. Motiar Rahman
    ,
    Mohan M. Kumaraswamy
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1087)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Procurement arrangements for collaborative working arrangements (CWAs) should arguably provide suitable protocols under which different project partners can interact effectively and maintain harmonious relationships and mobilize their collective efforts towards common project objectives. Technical abilities of different project partners for carrying out the works are important. Also critical are their “soft” or “relational” qualities to work jointly and synergistically in the project team. The aims of the reported study are to examine the importance of a single set of different factors for selecting consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and clients for CWAs; and to assess the relative importance of various factors and strategies for building CWAs. Data were collected internationally from 17 countries through a questionnaire survey and statistical analyses were conducted. Results attribute varying degrees of importance to various factors for selecting different project partners and suggest an interrelated and consolidated selection approach in general, except for “selecting” clients. The study confirms that trust and business ethics related factors and strategies are more helpful for CWAs than some others. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable CWAs and selecting appropriate project partners.
    • Download: (120.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Relational Selection for Collaborative Working Arrangements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/23065
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Motiar Rahman
    contributor authorMohan M. Kumaraswamy
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:22Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:40:22Z
    date copyrightOctober 2005
    date issued2005
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282005%29131%3A10%281087%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23065
    description abstractProcurement arrangements for collaborative working arrangements (CWAs) should arguably provide suitable protocols under which different project partners can interact effectively and maintain harmonious relationships and mobilize their collective efforts towards common project objectives. Technical abilities of different project partners for carrying out the works are important. Also critical are their “soft” or “relational” qualities to work jointly and synergistically in the project team. The aims of the reported study are to examine the importance of a single set of different factors for selecting consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and clients for CWAs; and to assess the relative importance of various factors and strategies for building CWAs. Data were collected internationally from 17 countries through a questionnaire survey and statistical analyses were conducted. Results attribute varying degrees of importance to various factors for selecting different project partners and suggest an interrelated and consolidated selection approach in general, except for “selecting” clients. The study confirms that trust and business ethics related factors and strategies are more helpful for CWAs than some others. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable CWAs and selecting appropriate project partners.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRelational Selection for Collaborative Working Arrangements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume131
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1087)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian