YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Numerical Modeling of Sedimentation Tanks

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Emad Imam
    ,
    John A. McCorquodale
    ,
    J. K. Bewtra
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:12(1740)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The numerical simulation of a sedimentation tank involves determining the velocity field and the sediment concentration distribution for the tank. In this study, the vertical velocity field is established by a finite difference model of the vorticity‐transport stream function equations with a constant eddy viscosity. The eddy viscosity is obtained with the aid of a physical model. The numerical model is verified experimentally. The vorticity transport is treated by the Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) method. A variable grid is used to maximize the effectiveness of the computational nodes. A weighted centereddifference‐upwind scheme is used for the convective terms. The two‐dimensional sediment transport (convective‐diffusion) equation is solved by the same numerical approach used for the vorticity transport equation. The bottom boundary condition permitted re‐entrainment of settled solids. The model can be used for steady or unsteady solids transport. The model is applied to study the effect of reaction baffle submergence on solid removal. The model output is also compared with the Camp‐Dobbins method of determining solids removed in turbulent flow. The removal predicted by the numerical model is consistently less than that predicted by the Camp‐Dobbins approach.
    • Download: (842.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Numerical Modeling of Sedimentation Tanks

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/22028
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEmad Imam
    contributor authorJohn A. McCorquodale
    contributor authorJ. K. Bewtra
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:38:24Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:38:24Z
    date copyrightDecember 1983
    date issued1983
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281983%29109%3A12%281740%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/22028
    description abstractThe numerical simulation of a sedimentation tank involves determining the velocity field and the sediment concentration distribution for the tank. In this study, the vertical velocity field is established by a finite difference model of the vorticity‐transport stream function equations with a constant eddy viscosity. The eddy viscosity is obtained with the aid of a physical model. The numerical model is verified experimentally. The vorticity transport is treated by the Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) method. A variable grid is used to maximize the effectiveness of the computational nodes. A weighted centereddifference‐upwind scheme is used for the convective terms. The two‐dimensional sediment transport (convective‐diffusion) equation is solved by the same numerical approach used for the vorticity transport equation. The bottom boundary condition permitted re‐entrainment of settled solids. The model can be used for steady or unsteady solids transport. The model is applied to study the effect of reaction baffle submergence on solid removal. The model output is also compared with the Camp‐Dobbins method of determining solids removed in turbulent flow. The removal predicted by the numerical model is consistently less than that predicted by the Camp‐Dobbins approach.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleNumerical Modeling of Sedimentation Tanks
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume109
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:12(1740)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1983:;Volume ( 109 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian